"Francesca Needham (back row, 4th from left)". Thanks for that, JL, I'd never have been able to tell otherwise...
But seriously, thank you for covering all this and for writing "prostitute" rather than "sex worker" like the Mail does - it's an important distinction, since "sex work" is used to sanitise the reality of prostitution. It's a euphemism like "comfort stations" instead of "brothels" or "trafficking hubs". I don't know anyone who's exited that industry who uses the term.
Also lol that the nonce's name is literally Willie.
Male fascists cross dressing in 1930s Nazi Germany is one of those things that seems self evident once informed. We all know a foundation of German Reich ideology was the subjugation of women. The gender identity extremism zeitgeist has picked up where they left off.
It is incidentally no surprise that Julius Evola was fascinated by transsexuals. He was probably the most important post-war fascist thinker and author. The New Right traces back a lot to him.
That being said, crossdressing was OK in certain contexts if it was clear that you were straight. if you were gay and caught crossdressing - good luck.
ERNST Rohm--- part of his downfall--- his little group[ of thugs and perverts had to go when Hilter made his deal with the Krupps and the rest of the Industrial Rich German ruling classes to seal his rise. They were a little too-too and they had to go--- that was the deal--- bad press--- not good at cocktail parties--- but they had served their purposes. So they were cleansed, 1934. --- But, that was ALL political. No "sexes" to it.
"Nazis in dresses" -that's exactly what these trans activists still are today! What a load of violent, mentally ill, highly manipulative, self-interested losers they all are in this week's update.
Draining. Having an early G&T. Medicinal. Can recommend.
Is the sickness getting worse or is it simply being exposed more? Why are the criminals at the Oregon WDI meeting not locked up yet? When will journalists find a backbone and start recording the truth? When will the dishonesty of the Labour activists be declared as unacceptable? Every one of these cross dressers appears to have a very dark side yet they are protected by people every where that refuse to see the reality. Had to laugh at the burly footballer who said his prostitution was in the past, as long ago as a year?! So that’s OK then. A reformed character? These people really do take us all for mugs. They believe that they can act with impunity, do whatever they want. Which mostly seems to be the case? When will the tide that is turning become tsunamic? (Made up word I think?) At least the vile psycho pervert threatening a deeply shocking school attack is locked up. Where he ought to stay. For ever. Deeply medicated, but allowed to mix with other violent psychos. Would be just awful if the other violent psychos didn’t take to him? Just awful.
I’m so grateful for Graham and all the people brave enough to put their heads above the parapet.
Big money behind this, Susan. Only reasonable assumption. Also, a number of politicians have family members who are 'trans' identified. That, however, does not entitle them to use their power and influence illegally and corruptly to campaign for everyone else's children and relatives to be 'transed'. Are the parties all being given backhanders by big business? It is definitely not concern for the "poor downtrodden 'trans' identified" AGPs, that's for sure. Unless, of course, lots of them are actually AGPs themselves, which would at least make sense. Maybe that's the answer, or a big part of it? Wouldn't surprise me at all that learn that many of our great and good in politics, the law, big business, are hypocritical drag queens in their spare moments. They certainly would have the salaries to support such a paraphilia.
I also want to know why these vile men who assaulted women and stole and damaged their property weren't taken into custody and charged. But they know how much protection they are given, it's their victims who are investigated and harassed by the idiot police. They're confident, they think they can do what they want, they lie about women, they beat them up, they prevent women from gathering to listen to each other. It's dreadful for the women they are attacking, obviously, but I think ultimately it's going show everyone that these are men acting out their violent fantasies against women behind the most repugnant manifestation of activism.
Only those determined to be dumb arses or liars would believe otherwise. They do what they want to women, they say whatever they like about them based on bullshit, and they stop women from gathering to listen to each other. But the no action is taken against them. This kind of behaviour would not be tolerated against any other group, but here it's not only tolerated, it's seen as reasonable, even as good.
Only persisent risk taking and bravery is going make the public, politicians and organisations see the extent of abuse that's taking place, and that people aren't going to take it. I'm hoping that within as many years as it took for this cult to take hold, sanity will be restored. Libraries won't have some bloke in ridiculous clothes and makeup reading stories to small children, and teachers won't be threatening kids who refuse to parrot the 100 genders bollocks. Unfortunately, by then there are also going to be a large number of men and women in their early 20s, trying to restore what they were before their mental and physical health was harmed by puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and a conspiracy of lies.
If women are serious about both holding meetings and repelling the TRAs, they need to be a lot smarter. They need to go prepared for the worst. Do not take personal phones which will be full of all kinds of information about family and friends and which these truly evil people will use. Take along a cheap burner phone instead for the purpose of telephoning the police if that becomes necessary.
If filming, take along a male supporter, probably several, and let them do it because those psychopaths won't attack them in the same way. If they do, the authorities will automatically take it seriously and the TRAs will be pursued. Otherwise, use karate and self-defence women at the top of their game, and inform the police in advance that you will be prepared to protect yourselves within the law, so use mace (in the States, not in the UK where it is banned), old keys that are no longer in use, tailed, metal combs, whatever. In the UK, bottles of diluted disinfectant would work just as well as mace or take along a small plastic container of actual pepper. Just ensure that everything is legal.
Also, take a can of spray paint that will be hell to remove and spray body parts (not eyes, naturally) to help with identification. Anyone in a tussle with a TRA should try and remove his/her mask, gloves, whatever, to aid identification. Anyone on-line who subsequently boasts about his/her part in beating up on 'TERFS' without provocation, keep a note of the handle. They can be traced through handles just as easily as through names these days.
Any injuries need to be reported both to the police and to the medical centres so that they may be recorded, photograph them and put them on-line on every social media platform available. If the police refuse to attend when an incident has occurred, contact the chief constable or whoever is top of the tree in the States, Canada, Australia, etc., and ask publicly why the police are refusing to protect women against male violence? I know at least some of these suggestions are being done already. Also, ask a couple (at least two, sympathetic) off-duty, ex or serving police to stand witness at any rally and report back on the TRAs' behaviour.
Send copies of filmed abuses to politicians and ask them to contact you to confirm that they have received them and what they intend to do. Shame them publicly, if you have to, and inform the media that they are biased towards the TRAs and have abandoned women entirely. Most media outlets will not respond, but some will. Then, campaign for all females in your political area to stop voting for any politician - name them - who does not support female rights and safety. No one is asking them to drop 'trans' rights, but to support the rights of everyone to free speech and free association within the limits of the law. The police have a duty to ensure that you can be heard in any rally, so if they are allowed too close, and drowning out your right to free speech, they need to be kept a distance away, big enough to not affect your right to speak and be heard.
I totally agree - and they need to identify the traitors in their midst and use this to pass on disinformation to the TRAs. TBH I am not sure they are even worth holding these events unless you can attract very large numbers enough to attract a police presence and a lot of publicity..
It's a shitty situation to be in when women have to take these measures just to gather and speak. Smart phones should definitely be left at home, but what these scumbags do does needs to be recorded. Over all though, women have to keep their safety in mind, I don't think getting into a tussel with these men and trying to remove their masks is a good idea, unless there are a large number of women and they have additional support. It's not safe to assume that the men attacking them aren't carrying weapons of some kind or objects that could be used as weapons. They clearly believe they can get away with virtually anything, and I think that has to be kept in mind when dealing with them. Women have to be able to protect themselves from as much harm as possible without risking prosection themselves.
Yes, be careful. But at the moment, these events are being attacked too easily- but without the media seeing/ reporting it, which was surely part of the point of the event...
As for "trans" and the Third Reich: There is not a single record of anyone being arrested, sent to a concentration camp, murdered or otherwise persecuted by the Nazis simply for being "transgender". No single name, no arrest date, nothing at all... Male homosexuals were persecuted, thousands were castrated, thousands were murdered. Some of them certainly
The only circumstance supporting that claim is the fact that the Nazis raided Magnus Hirschfeld's institute in Berlin soon after they came to power. They did so because the institute had been the center of the struggle of homosexuals for equal rights, and because its founder Hirschfeld was gay and a Jew.
Now, that institute sort of has a mixed role. On the one hand it not only fought for emancipation but also performed some scientific studies to that effect, and was a shelter and important meeting point for gay men (not sure about lesbians), including offering them medical treatment when needed. On the other hand, they also practiced quite a bit of pseudomedicine. It was also in this institute that the first ever recorded "sex change" surgeries took place. By 1933, two patients had undergone the surgery. Two!
So, in a way, we can say that the Institute invented the idea of transsexualism.
Now, one of the doctors who performed the surgeries fled the Nazi regime in 1933. (He may have been Jewish, I do not recall. At any rate, he understandably saw it fit to run.) The other doctor ended up being the approving and one overseeing the medical experiments on inmates in the Buchenwald concentration camp. As far as can be established he did not perform them himself, but he played an important role there.
As for the two patients: One was German, the other Dutch. The German patient disappears from the records, as did many others. It is unclear whether or not this had anything to do with the raid against the Institute. There could be many reasons for this, and in very few of them do the Nazis play a role at all. We know about the Dutch patient that he was back home in the Netherlands and lived there for some time after. There are no records of him being persecuted by the Nazis in 1941 or later.
Just keep that in mind, whenever Eddie Izzard identifies as victim again.
Thanks as ever for your hard work, JL!! Bringing us the horror stories.
One of the regular experiences of reading this is: female name; she/her; photo of hulking, ugly great bloke!! As Az Hakeem said on the last Queens' Speech these are fetishistic transvestites who have invented a new name for themselves!! Where did all the transvestites go? Nowhere, they are still here!
Portland makes Brighton look like a tea party! Well done the brave women but the police are a disgrace! This is, of course, where Kellie-Jay had to cancel a LWS event due to 'credible death threats'.
April Hutchinson - another female sporting hero alongside Riley Gaines, the pool players, Sharron Davies, Martina etc
Shocking tactics to try and derail Rosie Duffield!! And all because of that Barclays, Izzard!
Are you gay, Eddie? No. Are you a Jew? No. Are you a Gypsy? No. Then you wouldn't have gone to the concentration camps but, as a TRANSVESTITE you would have been welcomed in the Garman Army.
Re harassment of Rosie, it strikes me as borderline antisemitism for Izzard to compare what his situation would have been in Nazi Germany to that faced by Jews (and gays and Roma) in Nazi Germany. Sort of trivialising.
I wrote a comment on another discussion board about the death threats Rosie has received and men replied: shouldn’t take them seriously: she is causing a moral panic: sticks and stones, if she can’t take it she shouldn’t be in the job: everybody else is glad to respect poor trans people: etc. I could say I was shocked but I wasn’t really. Is it stupidity or misogyny? Both I suppose. I really thought women had made progress in the equality stakes over the last 60 years but I think I was kidding myself.
I suspect cowardice plays a large part too easier to support the trans than speak up and risk being cancelled - its actually not just women who have lost the right to speak.
"There’s a lot of transgenders out here that are tired of being picked on and we’re going to go into the schools and we’re going to kill their fucking children out here"
That guy should never see daylight.
They have no rational reasonable arguments so repeatedly resort to violence and intimidation, which is typically male behaviour.
I actually found myself thinking it’s not that bad this week , then i gave myself a quick kicking , it’s every bit as bad as it always is , they’re just getting braver ( not stunning ) . Am I becoming so immune to this that I could possibly think that
Admittedly I don’t come across it in my day to day life , but get a grip petal and get your head out your arse
He's just another arrogant narcissist whose status and success has allowed him to piss all over women and be allowed to pick up and drop his 'womanhood' whenever he feels like it. He's a transvestite and didn't claim female status, or at least change his pronouns until he saw would be beneficial to his career.
He’s a transvestite, and I was fine with that. So yes this whole woman thing is utter bullshit. I feel so disappointed in so many people I used to admire.
I never particularly liked him or found him funny, but he didn't bother me. But now he does because he's claiming something that isn't his to take. The kind of people who think anyone wearing clothes or styling their hair accociated with a different culture from their own has committed some major transgression, they are appropriating something doesn't belong to them, etc. But they wouldn't hesitate for a second to refer to Izzard as 'she' and 'her', and not going along with this lie would be transphobic, bigoted, blah, blah. It isn't appropriation, despite it being damaging to women in multiple ways.
On a strangely related note -- the odd self censorship of the press who sometimes treat facts as though they are dangerous, unspeakable adversaries being on display yet again--- does anyone actually yet know WHO the Dublin stabber was/is and if or not his motives could fall into the Social Incoherence Grievance category?
They're very tight with the facts, aren't they?--- Which makes one suspect the worst. --- And since they're mostly Pro- Freedom Murderers, Pro- Freedom Rapists, Pro- Freedom Kidnappers, Pro- Freedom Child Abusers on the overall ... ? Well, it seems a little shady, doesn't it?--- all their "hard right wing riot" for none but "hate of minorities" stuff being given emphasis, being given a tight spin--- ? --- Is it just hate? --- SHOULD I be doubtful--- ?
The reporting around this is so constrained it could be a Guardian - NYTs story about "female" rapists.... It reads like the Vatican reporting on the Priest Pedophile story, 2001. --- ?
What a World, What a World!... as that Witch once said, "my kingdom for an actual fact!"
False accusations of antisemitism have been weaponised by the right wing of the Labour Party against the left, and now they're being weaponised against the gender critical.
Because we're Freedom Rapists?--- Or are we Freedom Child Abusers so long as it's Hamas doing it?
I don't get that at all. I'm certainly NOT in favor of Freedom Kidnappers and Murderers and I don't think most of us here are. So how is that supposed to stick?
Jeremy Corbyn --- on the other hand --- sadly, I can see that... because he's still carrying on right now about "the occupation" and blaming Israel for all Gaza's problems despite the fact Israel has been withdrawn from Gaza for 18 years, it's been self-governing, and has even been free to elect Hamas as their popular government agreeing with their " we dedicate ourselves to kill Jews and abolish Israel" platform one would reasonably surmise.
And I guess Corbyn, too, to fit the times--- Corbyn is more of a Social Incoherence Warrior than he is a scientific-historical, facts based , class oriented materialist.
All these middle class managerial twits and slumming richies don't understand the first thing about fundamentalsm, I'll witness you that--- because they are absolutely clueless about it and they'd surely lay their own heads on the block and ours if given the chance, no doubt about it.
But GC? Corbyn's not GC either. He's all in on the woo.
I was referring to the power struggle that took place in the Labour Party during Corbyn's leadership, and to the purge of the left conducted by Starmer after he became leader in 2020. I do not support Hamas.
Edited to add: a lot of Labour Party members falsely accused of antisemitism are themselves Jewish. A member of the left-wing group Jewish Voice for Labour is is 37 times more likely to be investigated for antisemitism than a non-Jewish Labour Party member.
Helen Joyce, Graham and Jennifer Bilek have all been accused of being antisemitic because they're gender critical.
What is happening to Rosie Duffield shows that not all accusations of antisemitism, especially within the Labour Party, can be taken at face value.
"Francesca Needham (back row, 4th from left)". Thanks for that, JL, I'd never have been able to tell otherwise...
But seriously, thank you for covering all this and for writing "prostitute" rather than "sex worker" like the Mail does - it's an important distinction, since "sex work" is used to sanitise the reality of prostitution. It's a euphemism like "comfort stations" instead of "brothels" or "trafficking hubs". I don't know anyone who's exited that industry who uses the term.
Also lol that the nonce's name is literally Willie.
Many thanks JL.
Male fascists cross dressing in 1930s Nazi Germany is one of those things that seems self evident once informed. We all know a foundation of German Reich ideology was the subjugation of women. The gender identity extremism zeitgeist has picked up where they left off.
It is incidentally no surprise that Julius Evola was fascinated by transsexuals. He was probably the most important post-war fascist thinker and author. The New Right traces back a lot to him.
That being said, crossdressing was OK in certain contexts if it was clear that you were straight. if you were gay and caught crossdressing - good luck.
ERNST Rohm--- part of his downfall--- his little group[ of thugs and perverts had to go when Hilter made his deal with the Krupps and the rest of the Industrial Rich German ruling classes to seal his rise. They were a little too-too and they had to go--- that was the deal--- bad press--- not good at cocktail parties--- but they had served their purposes. So they were cleansed, 1934. --- But, that was ALL political. No "sexes" to it.
Some of these men look like the prostitute AND the truck driver that murdered them simultaneously.
🤣🤣🤣
"Nazis in dresses" -that's exactly what these trans activists still are today! What a load of violent, mentally ill, highly manipulative, self-interested losers they all are in this week's update.
Draining. Having an early G&T. Medicinal. Can recommend.
Is the sickness getting worse or is it simply being exposed more? Why are the criminals at the Oregon WDI meeting not locked up yet? When will journalists find a backbone and start recording the truth? When will the dishonesty of the Labour activists be declared as unacceptable? Every one of these cross dressers appears to have a very dark side yet they are protected by people every where that refuse to see the reality. Had to laugh at the burly footballer who said his prostitution was in the past, as long ago as a year?! So that’s OK then. A reformed character? These people really do take us all for mugs. They believe that they can act with impunity, do whatever they want. Which mostly seems to be the case? When will the tide that is turning become tsunamic? (Made up word I think?) At least the vile psycho pervert threatening a deeply shocking school attack is locked up. Where he ought to stay. For ever. Deeply medicated, but allowed to mix with other violent psychos. Would be just awful if the other violent psychos didn’t take to him? Just awful.
I’m so grateful for Graham and all the people brave enough to put their heads above the parapet.
Big money behind this, Susan. Only reasonable assumption. Also, a number of politicians have family members who are 'trans' identified. That, however, does not entitle them to use their power and influence illegally and corruptly to campaign for everyone else's children and relatives to be 'transed'. Are the parties all being given backhanders by big business? It is definitely not concern for the "poor downtrodden 'trans' identified" AGPs, that's for sure. Unless, of course, lots of them are actually AGPs themselves, which would at least make sense. Maybe that's the answer, or a big part of it? Wouldn't surprise me at all that learn that many of our great and good in politics, the law, big business, are hypocritical drag queens in their spare moments. They certainly would have the salaries to support such a paraphilia.
Let's hope the violent psycho doesn't end up in a women's prison.
I also want to know why these vile men who assaulted women and stole and damaged their property weren't taken into custody and charged. But they know how much protection they are given, it's their victims who are investigated and harassed by the idiot police. They're confident, they think they can do what they want, they lie about women, they beat them up, they prevent women from gathering to listen to each other. It's dreadful for the women they are attacking, obviously, but I think ultimately it's going show everyone that these are men acting out their violent fantasies against women behind the most repugnant manifestation of activism.
Only those determined to be dumb arses or liars would believe otherwise. They do what they want to women, they say whatever they like about them based on bullshit, and they stop women from gathering to listen to each other. But the no action is taken against them. This kind of behaviour would not be tolerated against any other group, but here it's not only tolerated, it's seen as reasonable, even as good.
Only persisent risk taking and bravery is going make the public, politicians and organisations see the extent of abuse that's taking place, and that people aren't going to take it. I'm hoping that within as many years as it took for this cult to take hold, sanity will be restored. Libraries won't have some bloke in ridiculous clothes and makeup reading stories to small children, and teachers won't be threatening kids who refuse to parrot the 100 genders bollocks. Unfortunately, by then there are also going to be a large number of men and women in their early 20s, trying to restore what they were before their mental and physical health was harmed by puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and a conspiracy of lies.
If women are serious about both holding meetings and repelling the TRAs, they need to be a lot smarter. They need to go prepared for the worst. Do not take personal phones which will be full of all kinds of information about family and friends and which these truly evil people will use. Take along a cheap burner phone instead for the purpose of telephoning the police if that becomes necessary.
If filming, take along a male supporter, probably several, and let them do it because those psychopaths won't attack them in the same way. If they do, the authorities will automatically take it seriously and the TRAs will be pursued. Otherwise, use karate and self-defence women at the top of their game, and inform the police in advance that you will be prepared to protect yourselves within the law, so use mace (in the States, not in the UK where it is banned), old keys that are no longer in use, tailed, metal combs, whatever. In the UK, bottles of diluted disinfectant would work just as well as mace or take along a small plastic container of actual pepper. Just ensure that everything is legal.
Also, take a can of spray paint that will be hell to remove and spray body parts (not eyes, naturally) to help with identification. Anyone in a tussle with a TRA should try and remove his/her mask, gloves, whatever, to aid identification. Anyone on-line who subsequently boasts about his/her part in beating up on 'TERFS' without provocation, keep a note of the handle. They can be traced through handles just as easily as through names these days.
Any injuries need to be reported both to the police and to the medical centres so that they may be recorded, photograph them and put them on-line on every social media platform available. If the police refuse to attend when an incident has occurred, contact the chief constable or whoever is top of the tree in the States, Canada, Australia, etc., and ask publicly why the police are refusing to protect women against male violence? I know at least some of these suggestions are being done already. Also, ask a couple (at least two, sympathetic) off-duty, ex or serving police to stand witness at any rally and report back on the TRAs' behaviour.
Send copies of filmed abuses to politicians and ask them to contact you to confirm that they have received them and what they intend to do. Shame them publicly, if you have to, and inform the media that they are biased towards the TRAs and have abandoned women entirely. Most media outlets will not respond, but some will. Then, campaign for all females in your political area to stop voting for any politician - name them - who does not support female rights and safety. No one is asking them to drop 'trans' rights, but to support the rights of everyone to free speech and free association within the limits of the law. The police have a duty to ensure that you can be heard in any rally, so if they are allowed too close, and drowning out your right to free speech, they need to be kept a distance away, big enough to not affect your right to speak and be heard.
I totally agree - and they need to identify the traitors in their midst and use this to pass on disinformation to the TRAs. TBH I am not sure they are even worth holding these events unless you can attract very large numbers enough to attract a police presence and a lot of publicity..
Yes! You are so brave to take these actions, but you do need to protect yourselves properly.
It's a shitty situation to be in when women have to take these measures just to gather and speak. Smart phones should definitely be left at home, but what these scumbags do does needs to be recorded. Over all though, women have to keep their safety in mind, I don't think getting into a tussel with these men and trying to remove their masks is a good idea, unless there are a large number of women and they have additional support. It's not safe to assume that the men attacking them aren't carrying weapons of some kind or objects that could be used as weapons. They clearly believe they can get away with virtually anything, and I think that has to be kept in mind when dealing with them. Women have to be able to protect themselves from as much harm as possible without risking prosection themselves.
Yes, be careful. But at the moment, these events are being attacked too easily- but without the media seeing/ reporting it, which was surely part of the point of the event...
As for "trans" and the Third Reich: There is not a single record of anyone being arrested, sent to a concentration camp, murdered or otherwise persecuted by the Nazis simply for being "transgender". No single name, no arrest date, nothing at all... Male homosexuals were persecuted, thousands were castrated, thousands were murdered. Some of them certainly
The only circumstance supporting that claim is the fact that the Nazis raided Magnus Hirschfeld's institute in Berlin soon after they came to power. They did so because the institute had been the center of the struggle of homosexuals for equal rights, and because its founder Hirschfeld was gay and a Jew.
Now, that institute sort of has a mixed role. On the one hand it not only fought for emancipation but also performed some scientific studies to that effect, and was a shelter and important meeting point for gay men (not sure about lesbians), including offering them medical treatment when needed. On the other hand, they also practiced quite a bit of pseudomedicine. It was also in this institute that the first ever recorded "sex change" surgeries took place. By 1933, two patients had undergone the surgery. Two!
So, in a way, we can say that the Institute invented the idea of transsexualism.
Now, one of the doctors who performed the surgeries fled the Nazi regime in 1933. (He may have been Jewish, I do not recall. At any rate, he understandably saw it fit to run.) The other doctor ended up being the approving and one overseeing the medical experiments on inmates in the Buchenwald concentration camp. As far as can be established he did not perform them himself, but he played an important role there.
As for the two patients: One was German, the other Dutch. The German patient disappears from the records, as did many others. It is unclear whether or not this had anything to do with the raid against the Institute. There could be many reasons for this, and in very few of them do the Nazis play a role at all. We know about the Dutch patient that he was back home in the Netherlands and lived there for some time after. There are no records of him being persecuted by the Nazis in 1941 or later.
Just keep that in mind, whenever Eddie Izzard identifies as victim again.
More news of The Social Incoherence Warriors & their activities...
Ack!
Thanks as ever for your hard work, JL!! Bringing us the horror stories.
One of the regular experiences of reading this is: female name; she/her; photo of hulking, ugly great bloke!! As Az Hakeem said on the last Queens' Speech these are fetishistic transvestites who have invented a new name for themselves!! Where did all the transvestites go? Nowhere, they are still here!
Portland makes Brighton look like a tea party! Well done the brave women but the police are a disgrace! This is, of course, where Kellie-Jay had to cancel a LWS event due to 'credible death threats'.
April Hutchinson - another female sporting hero alongside Riley Gaines, the pool players, Sharron Davies, Martina etc
Shocking tactics to try and derail Rosie Duffield!! And all because of that Barclays, Izzard!
Are you gay, Eddie? No. Are you a Jew? No. Are you a Gypsy? No. Then you wouldn't have gone to the concentration camps but, as a TRANSVESTITE you would have been welcomed in the Garman Army.
Thanks again, JL
Bring on GNS 😫
Dusty
Re harassment of Rosie, it strikes me as borderline antisemitism for Izzard to compare what his situation would have been in Nazi Germany to that faced by Jews (and gays and Roma) in Nazi Germany. Sort of trivialising.
I wrote a comment on another discussion board about the death threats Rosie has received and men replied: shouldn’t take them seriously: she is causing a moral panic: sticks and stones, if she can’t take it she shouldn’t be in the job: everybody else is glad to respect poor trans people: etc. I could say I was shocked but I wasn’t really. Is it stupidity or misogyny? Both I suppose. I really thought women had made progress in the equality stakes over the last 60 years but I think I was kidding myself.
I suspect cowardice plays a large part too easier to support the trans than speak up and risk being cancelled - its actually not just women who have lost the right to speak.
I agree- Izzard is probably anti-semitic if he dis-respects the holocaust, by using it is a comparison to his own privileged position
"There’s a lot of transgenders out here that are tired of being picked on and we’re going to go into the schools and we’re going to kill their fucking children out here"
That guy should never see daylight.
They have no rational reasonable arguments so repeatedly resort to violence and intimidation, which is typically male behaviour.
Another week another etc etc etc
I actually found myself thinking it’s not that bad this week , then i gave myself a quick kicking , it’s every bit as bad as it always is , they’re just getting braver ( not stunning ) . Am I becoming so immune to this that I could possibly think that
Admittedly I don’t come across it in my day to day life , but get a grip petal and get your head out your arse
I used to love Eddie Izzard, I can’t watch him now.
He's just another arrogant narcissist whose status and success has allowed him to piss all over women and be allowed to pick up and drop his 'womanhood' whenever he feels like it. He's a transvestite and didn't claim female status, or at least change his pronouns until he saw would be beneficial to his career.
He’s a transvestite, and I was fine with that. So yes this whole woman thing is utter bullshit. I feel so disappointed in so many people I used to admire.
I never particularly liked him or found him funny, but he didn't bother me. But now he does because he's claiming something that isn't his to take. The kind of people who think anyone wearing clothes or styling their hair accociated with a different culture from their own has committed some major transgression, they are appropriating something doesn't belong to them, etc. But they wouldn't hesitate for a second to refer to Izzard as 'she' and 'her', and not going along with this lie would be transphobic, bigoted, blah, blah. It isn't appropriation, despite it being damaging to women in multiple ways.
It’s utter insanity.
TBh I never found him funny and I would guess like many celebs he is terrified of career being cancelled like Grahams was.
On a strangely related note -- the odd self censorship of the press who sometimes treat facts as though they are dangerous, unspeakable adversaries being on display yet again--- does anyone actually yet know WHO the Dublin stabber was/is and if or not his motives could fall into the Social Incoherence Grievance category?
They're very tight with the facts, aren't they?--- Which makes one suspect the worst. --- And since they're mostly Pro- Freedom Murderers, Pro- Freedom Rapists, Pro- Freedom Kidnappers, Pro- Freedom Child Abusers on the overall ... ? Well, it seems a little shady, doesn't it?--- all their "hard right wing riot" for none but "hate of minorities" stuff being given emphasis, being given a tight spin--- ? --- Is it just hate? --- SHOULD I be doubtful--- ?
The reporting around this is so constrained it could be a Guardian - NYTs story about "female" rapists.... It reads like the Vatican reporting on the Priest Pedophile story, 2001. --- ?
What a World, What a World!... as that Witch once said, "my kingdom for an actual fact!"
Sorry, I don't understand your post. And what is' social incoherence grievance'?
That tweet from @NoBonzo is still up
- please report him to Twitter for inciting violence.
False accusations of antisemitism have been weaponised by the right wing of the Labour Party against the left, and now they're being weaponised against the gender critical.
Because we're Freedom Rapists?--- Or are we Freedom Child Abusers so long as it's Hamas doing it?
I don't get that at all. I'm certainly NOT in favor of Freedom Kidnappers and Murderers and I don't think most of us here are. So how is that supposed to stick?
Jeremy Corbyn --- on the other hand --- sadly, I can see that... because he's still carrying on right now about "the occupation" and blaming Israel for all Gaza's problems despite the fact Israel has been withdrawn from Gaza for 18 years, it's been self-governing, and has even been free to elect Hamas as their popular government agreeing with their " we dedicate ourselves to kill Jews and abolish Israel" platform one would reasonably surmise.
And I guess Corbyn, too, to fit the times--- Corbyn is more of a Social Incoherence Warrior than he is a scientific-historical, facts based , class oriented materialist.
All these middle class managerial twits and slumming richies don't understand the first thing about fundamentalsm, I'll witness you that--- because they are absolutely clueless about it and they'd surely lay their own heads on the block and ours if given the chance, no doubt about it.
But GC? Corbyn's not GC either. He's all in on the woo.
I was referring to the power struggle that took place in the Labour Party during Corbyn's leadership, and to the purge of the left conducted by Starmer after he became leader in 2020. I do not support Hamas.
Edited to add: a lot of Labour Party members falsely accused of antisemitism are themselves Jewish. A member of the left-wing group Jewish Voice for Labour is is 37 times more likely to be investigated for antisemitism than a non-Jewish Labour Party member.
Helen Joyce, Graham and Jennifer Bilek have all been accused of being antisemitic because they're gender critical.
What is happening to Rosie Duffield shows that not all accusations of antisemitism, especially within the Labour Party, can be taken at face value.