I tell a much loved but usually delusional family member that he needs to be careful of what he reads online because it might just be a load of bollocks, but as we read today the mainstream media is literally lying to us on such basic things as the true sex of a terrible criminal. The mainstream media will invalidate itself if it can’t respect basic journalistic values and basic truths. And with the deep fakes coming thick and fast online we need a responsible regulated media more than ever. Their own hidden social agenda is more important than raw basic facts. Sad sad times. At least we have JL to put reality on our radars. Thanks JL!
oh JL i just filled out that consultation form thing. Pretty sure my response will mean piss all. It was not easy and i was struggling with making any sense. Its was not a moron friendly survey. even armed with the TGT answers. And another one someone sent me. Oh well. They would had at least got the jist that i think its all a load of bollocks. Not exactly court room grade testimony though… exhibit 3a…. mr…… says….’ this is all a load of bollocks’
The segment on UK military housing contains this statement: “Women need to have secure accommodation where they feel safe.”
Isn’t the main point that women have a right to BE safe? Feelings aside? If we center feelings, then no material conditions need to change, only our feelings about them.
Here's an idea for getting the word out to women who think they are safe around cross-sex ideating men. Print out these stories, cleverly place them in slick real estate and interior design magazines, leave these for others to find in doctors' waiting rooms, bus stations, lobbies, just, all over. I want to put these articles on the stoop of my ex-husband's building (secret crossdresser since at least 1991, divorced finally in 1999) where he lives with his "lesbian partner" in an apartment worth 3M (Brooklyn, NY) fully paid off during a period when he refused to pay child support. There are so many, it could be a pile of murderers on every step.
Most people just do not understand what these men are, Ute. They just do not get the sexual elements in it all, but believe that they are being kind to these gross monsters.
I had a man berate me for being 'transphobic'. He stated that these men were homosexuals and are no threat to females. This is the mentality and lack of any research that these keyboard warriors for these men have. I often think that some men just see the word, men, and assume that the witches are having a go against some poor chap who is all innocence and light. I recall being warned about such men (trans) way back when I was quite young, that they had to be avoided because they would cause great harm by marrying unsuspecting women, so men have always known that they exist out there on the fringes. Except they are now in the public square and in our spaces.
Those news stories about Blake infuriated me. I read one and was thinking, "Hang on, isn't it super rare for a woman to do anything like this?" Then I looked at another story that had a photo of him and thought "Man" (but not as obvious as it is with some). So I checked reduxx and sure enough: MAN. These are not women's crimes. I think it constitutes a miscarriage of justice to refer (and record?) this as a woman's crime. It's certainly a complete distortion of the truth; the antithesis of proper journalism.
Also can't believe, if you were going to name any trans-identified man as an inspiration for This Girl Can, you would choose Hubbard. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel!
I believe it is actually contrary to female human rights, natural justice and any kind of statistical sense if they are recorded as female crimes. As soon as I read the report, I guessed it was a male.
The fact that the first 'transphobic' conviction in Spain is of a 'twanswoman' against another one is delicious beyond description. The schadenfreude I feel is enough for me to dine out on it for months. There is a God, after all.
JL, by now you must have amassed an encyclopaedia of sickeningly repulsive, narcissistic sports cheats, sex offenders and abusers. There is enough evidence to peak the entire planet. I can only blame a complete lack of journalistic integrity that these stories are not more commonly known along with cowardice and delusion. Well done to you for this work along with so many others. We can only hope that it pays off in the end and that the so called ‘proper’ journalists feel ashamed at what their failure has caused.
Yes, I suppose so, but by journalist I mean those in charge of rooting out and relaying information really. Who do we trust these days when the MSM is controlled by the rich and powerful ……or the captured?
The Free Press hasn’t disappointed me thus far. Others on Substack (Jesse Singal, Gerald Posner) are similarly trustworthy and professional. I’m not sure the paradigm of single-reporter media enterprise is the answer, but it’s an accountable port in the storm, for now.
What a catalogue of abuse, entitlement and privilege by and for TRAs and misogynists. Nothing new, but it still makes me want to puke out the rage and put it to better use. As usual, the rights of the abusers doesn't only take precedence over the abused, they are further bullied but left open to criminal proceedings.
Women's sports takes another assault, women's rights, women's safety. As Lauren Levey points out, women have not only the right to 'feel' safe, but be safe, because they clearly aren't the same thing at all. But we end up with a kick in the teeth and assertions of bigotry, hatred etc, etc. Got to protect those poor, beleaguered 'women' with dicks, then give them everything they demand and wait for more demands.
That was a tough read. They always are, but I've got a cat, so this one got to me on that level too. How is it "criminal damage"? Keying a car is criminal damage; killing someone's pet should be treated as far worse, both in itself, and because it so often escalates; maybe it would even have saved a human life if it had been taken more seriously in this case.. I know it's beside the main point of the article, and it's fucked-up that he's being called a woman too.
Thanks for your hard work as ever, JL, bringing us these gobsmacking horror stories.
How unbelievably awful for the couple who have had their son taken from them!!
I note in the Army story you state:
"Another woman currently serving in the forces, told The Telegraph that she had raised concerns with her superiors after a trans-identified male joined her squadron but that her worries were dismissed. She was told that his presence wasn’t an issue because ‘you can tell who are predators’."
Hmm, do the predators wear signs around their necks then? Ted Bundy was young, handsome and smartly dressed - and killed more than 30 women.
This is, of course, aside from privacy, dignity etc!
The story about the Armed Forces particularly irked me, Dusty. Only a few weeks ago, a young friend of mine tried to join the Army reserves, hoping the experience would prove useful to his career - he's a civil servant with ambitions to work for the secret service. He was turned down because he takes very low level dosage anti-depressants. The forces will pander to the delusions of a man who believes himself to be a woman and takes cross-sex hormones in huge doses but my friend can't do a bit of pretend solidiering for two hours a week because of his prescription medication??! Truly through the looking glass.
JL thanks for your previous info re the Abbas toilets case and I have now read that judgment and the EAT judgment ( Earl Milton Council) you also referred to. Do you think that it could be argued that, if an employer supplies only unisex toilets ( that are not self contained and leaving aside what the employer may say about trans identifying males) this may be direct sex discrimination since it is providing inadequate facilities for women??
Hmmm... Good question, Dusty. The Abbas tribunal case stemmed from a female employee being provided with facilities substandard to those provided for the men. (There were specifically male toilets but no female facilities. She being the only woman on-site was forced to 'make do' with the unisex accessible toilet or was told she could use the men's room.) Consequently, she was treated differently from male colleagues and, ergo, was discriminated against because of her sex. And it was a similar case with the EAT - the women were expected to use the men's toilets when their toilets weren't in use. With 'gender neutral' (ie mixed sex) facilities, both sexes are treated the same.
However... The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 set out statutory obligations to provide separate male and female toilet facilities for employees. The regulations currently allow employers to install gender neutral facilities but only where they are in separate rooms that are lockable from the inside. So, if the unisex toilet is NOT self contained, I suspect there are grounds for legal action. Not necessarily because women are being discriminated because of their sex but because the employer is in breach of the regulations.
Yet again you are way ahead of the curve with your grip on reality JL. Thank you.
But even as I read things the way I do this has changed. I am wondering what's true, what's being altered and twisted. It's way beyond 'left' or 'right'. Did something actually happen? How should I respond? We have lost a key element of public record and access to factual and informed resources - that long list of publications says it all. We won't be looking back on news reports with any kind of assurance as they'll all have 'content warning: this is all the deluded fantasy of a broken organisation' on them. Almost everything is now steeped in propaganda. The last century or two of news production followed vaguely agreed rules and comparing news reports you could identify the main thread that ran through them all. We all became connected to information and it was beamed around the world and into our homes in seconds. But I am struggling to fathom this new world I live in - it's like AI-generated 'product' being so dangerous because it's similar to what could be true, but how can we verify it. It's got enough elements to be plausible, but could be true or could be totally invented, or a smattering of both, open to debate. Yes, it's dangerous, and how can we counter it?
There are so many disturbing elements to all of these reports. I was misled by the lies that the murderer of Jorge Martin Carreno was a 'she' so it's another nasty surprise today. I was wondering how 'she' with 'her' clear severe mental health issues had been allowed to continue the trajectory until 'she' murdered that man. Then the actual facts start to come out after outrage over the continual fabrication of 'realities'. That man and his multiple alternative names was known to mental health services, which seem to be in such a state no one is safe - no member of the public or service user. He was also known to 'gender services' who obviously oversaw his mental illness and severe delusions as some form of fun gender rights experiment and oversaw giving him hormones. They officially repackaged a male sexual fetish into some created gender freedom to relieve his 'dysphoria'. Those services are taking deluded and deviant people and putting rocket-fuel in them, then sending them out into communities as ticking gender time-bombs. How are they not also responsible for this? He was known to services who rubber-stamped this psychosis and sent him out to live his best life, screw everyone else. Most photos are him smirking. Every institution that has been normalising this gender shite has allowed this. No, that weirdo who is putting others at risk is nice and fluffy and you MUST be nice to him.
It's so hard to pick out truth from the massive web of lies being deliberately spun daily all in service of Genderology. The Gruaniad only edited that story after a huge backlash. For those of you unaware it's now all kicked off again, this time it's yet another Gruaniad journo telling them and Kath Viner to stop lying and misleading readers. She was misled herself:
It's the women who are complicit in this mind bending bullshit that amaze me! Like Nicola Braganza in last week's newsletter, those female swimmers grouped smiling around "Meghan" Cortez-Fields while he breezes in and steals their medals. Are they scared what will happen if they make a fuss, confused about what to do, or are they actually so stupid that they don't see the self-harm?
But also likely afraid of the reaction of their female peers if they’re insufficiently “kind.” They’ve already lost the title; must they lose their ‘friends’ too? Answer, from my vantage point: yes, they’re 100% worth losing, but it took some pain and growth to get here. Those girls are his fresh victims, and they might just be in shock.
This movement is revealing the dark depths of male loathing, resentment, ignorance and fear of women in all western (and other) societies today, whether these misogynists are the depraved killers and cheats who assume female names and 'identities' or their powerful apologists in the media etc who clearly revel in pinning such depravity on women and in celebrating men beating women in sports and forcing the women and girls who are beaten to smile in the presence of their cheating, frankly psychotic abusers. Masculinity is in VERY bad shape indeed if it has to go to these lengths to abuse and belittle women. Either these are the death throes of the patriarchy or of humanity. I'm fighting for the former, for my sons as much as for my daughter, and all the other sons and daughters, but I am running out of hope.
Yes it's like Dr Frankenstein has been in his lab playing around with incels, Andrew Tate, male sexual fetish, violence, paedophilia and good old fashioned misogyny and come up with ... Trans Ideology.
Exactly, and the left-wing political effery in the US (reading Kara Dansky's 'Reckoning' at the moment) that seems in part at least due to their terror of another Trump presidency, and their reliance on Big Trans money, conditional on supporting the ideology.
Just superb and energizing, yes. SO reassuring that someone as gutsy and brilliant as Kara is fighting so hard on our side. The Democrats will listen and heed her advice or lose.
I see that Dave aka 'Katie' has been busy with getting some work done on his face,at least that would have given the LGB youth that he stalks and sexually harasses some respite. 'Katie' is a dirty old man perve.
I tell a much loved but usually delusional family member that he needs to be careful of what he reads online because it might just be a load of bollocks, but as we read today the mainstream media is literally lying to us on such basic things as the true sex of a terrible criminal. The mainstream media will invalidate itself if it can’t respect basic journalistic values and basic truths. And with the deep fakes coming thick and fast online we need a responsible regulated media more than ever. Their own hidden social agenda is more important than raw basic facts. Sad sad times. At least we have JL to put reality on our radars. Thanks JL!
*Bows* At your service, CB! 👊
oh JL i just filled out that consultation form thing. Pretty sure my response will mean piss all. It was not easy and i was struggling with making any sense. Its was not a moron friendly survey. even armed with the TGT answers. And another one someone sent me. Oh well. They would had at least got the jist that i think its all a load of bollocks. Not exactly court room grade testimony though… exhibit 3a…. mr…… says….’ this is all a load of bollocks’
The segment on UK military housing contains this statement: “Women need to have secure accommodation where they feel safe.”
Isn’t the main point that women have a right to BE safe? Feelings aside? If we center feelings, then no material conditions need to change, only our feelings about them.
Wow. So much here that melts any sense of sensible into a deeply unsavoury soup.
Obviously not the most disturbing story here by a long way, but it took a while to process this gem:
This Girl Can.
Stated Mission: “[To] celebrate a realistic vision of women and exercise... and to tackle the gender activity gap.”
Reality: "Let's showcase four blokes."
You would almost think that it was deliberate, Science...
Just so. Brilliant handle, btw!
Here's an idea for getting the word out to women who think they are safe around cross-sex ideating men. Print out these stories, cleverly place them in slick real estate and interior design magazines, leave these for others to find in doctors' waiting rooms, bus stations, lobbies, just, all over. I want to put these articles on the stoop of my ex-husband's building (secret crossdresser since at least 1991, divorced finally in 1999) where he lives with his "lesbian partner" in an apartment worth 3M (Brooklyn, NY) fully paid off during a period when he refused to pay child support. There are so many, it could be a pile of murderers on every step.
Most people just do not understand what these men are, Ute. They just do not get the sexual elements in it all, but believe that they are being kind to these gross monsters.
I had a man berate me for being 'transphobic'. He stated that these men were homosexuals and are no threat to females. This is the mentality and lack of any research that these keyboard warriors for these men have. I often think that some men just see the word, men, and assume that the witches are having a go against some poor chap who is all innocence and light. I recall being warned about such men (trans) way back when I was quite young, that they had to be avoided because they would cause great harm by marrying unsuspecting women, so men have always known that they exist out there on the fringes. Except they are now in the public square and in our spaces.
Great idea.
Those news stories about Blake infuriated me. I read one and was thinking, "Hang on, isn't it super rare for a woman to do anything like this?" Then I looked at another story that had a photo of him and thought "Man" (but not as obvious as it is with some). So I checked reduxx and sure enough: MAN. These are not women's crimes. I think it constitutes a miscarriage of justice to refer (and record?) this as a woman's crime. It's certainly a complete distortion of the truth; the antithesis of proper journalism.
Also can't believe, if you were going to name any trans-identified man as an inspiration for This Girl Can, you would choose Hubbard. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel!
I believe it is actually contrary to female human rights, natural justice and any kind of statistical sense if they are recorded as female crimes. As soon as I read the report, I guessed it was a male.
The fact that the first 'transphobic' conviction in Spain is of a 'twanswoman' against another one is delicious beyond description. The schadenfreude I feel is enough for me to dine out on it for months. There is a God, after all.
And we can picture her laughing along with you. 😉
"I'm more of a woman than you'll ever be". Now where have we heard that before? 🤣🤔
Yes, utterly deranged the lot of them.
JL, by now you must have amassed an encyclopaedia of sickeningly repulsive, narcissistic sports cheats, sex offenders and abusers. There is enough evidence to peak the entire planet. I can only blame a complete lack of journalistic integrity that these stories are not more commonly known along with cowardice and delusion. Well done to you for this work along with so many others. We can only hope that it pays off in the end and that the so called ‘proper’ journalists feel ashamed at what their failure has caused.
Many thanks, TT. Your kind words are much appreciated.
any Journo who tried, would just get sacked!
Yes, I suppose so, but by journalist I mean those in charge of rooting out and relaying information really. Who do we trust these days when the MSM is controlled by the rich and powerful ……or the captured?
The Free Press hasn’t disappointed me thus far. Others on Substack (Jesse Singal, Gerald Posner) are similarly trustworthy and professional. I’m not sure the paradigm of single-reporter media enterprise is the answer, but it’s an accountable port in the storm, for now.
Yes, citizen journalists are the way to go. But the BBC, for example, should be ashamed of itself.
Reporting for duty 😂
Dusty
You were on my mind as well as JL 👏👏
I wouldn't count on it, TT.
I know. I thought that as I typed it. 🤨
What a catalogue of abuse, entitlement and privilege by and for TRAs and misogynists. Nothing new, but it still makes me want to puke out the rage and put it to better use. As usual, the rights of the abusers doesn't only take precedence over the abused, they are further bullied but left open to criminal proceedings.
Women's sports takes another assault, women's rights, women's safety. As Lauren Levey points out, women have not only the right to 'feel' safe, but be safe, because they clearly aren't the same thing at all. But we end up with a kick in the teeth and assertions of bigotry, hatred etc, etc. Got to protect those poor, beleaguered 'women' with dicks, then give them everything they demand and wait for more demands.
That was a tough read. They always are, but I've got a cat, so this one got to me on that level too. How is it "criminal damage"? Keying a car is criminal damage; killing someone's pet should be treated as far worse, both in itself, and because it so often escalates; maybe it would even have saved a human life if it had been taken more seriously in this case.. I know it's beside the main point of the article, and it's fucked-up that he's being called a woman too.
Looking forward to the Good News Supplement.
Me too Fintan, as a cat lover as well as believer in girls and womens rights, that sick evil bloke needs a special place in hell reserved for him.
On its way!
I'm surprised GUSU didn't include a blow up doll in that list of realistic women.
God, I'm so sick of this shit.
Same
Thanks for your hard work as ever, JL, bringing us these gobsmacking horror stories.
How unbelievably awful for the couple who have had their son taken from them!!
I note in the Army story you state:
"Another woman currently serving in the forces, told The Telegraph that she had raised concerns with her superiors after a trans-identified male joined her squadron but that her worries were dismissed. She was told that his presence wasn’t an issue because ‘you can tell who are predators’."
Hmm, do the predators wear signs around their necks then? Ted Bundy was young, handsome and smartly dressed - and killed more than 30 women.
This is, of course, aside from privacy, dignity etc!
Thanks again
Dusty
The story about the Armed Forces particularly irked me, Dusty. Only a few weeks ago, a young friend of mine tried to join the Army reserves, hoping the experience would prove useful to his career - he's a civil servant with ambitions to work for the secret service. He was turned down because he takes very low level dosage anti-depressants. The forces will pander to the delusions of a man who believes himself to be a woman and takes cross-sex hormones in huge doses but my friend can't do a bit of pretend solidiering for two hours a week because of his prescription medication??! Truly through the looking glass.
That is so bonkers, JL!!!!!
Dusty
JL thanks for your previous info re the Abbas toilets case and I have now read that judgment and the EAT judgment ( Earl Milton Council) you also referred to. Do you think that it could be argued that, if an employer supplies only unisex toilets ( that are not self contained and leaving aside what the employer may say about trans identifying males) this may be direct sex discrimination since it is providing inadequate facilities for women??
Dusty
Hmmm... Good question, Dusty. The Abbas tribunal case stemmed from a female employee being provided with facilities substandard to those provided for the men. (There were specifically male toilets but no female facilities. She being the only woman on-site was forced to 'make do' with the unisex accessible toilet or was told she could use the men's room.) Consequently, she was treated differently from male colleagues and, ergo, was discriminated against because of her sex. And it was a similar case with the EAT - the women were expected to use the men's toilets when their toilets weren't in use. With 'gender neutral' (ie mixed sex) facilities, both sexes are treated the same.
However... The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 set out statutory obligations to provide separate male and female toilet facilities for employees. The regulations currently allow employers to install gender neutral facilities but only where they are in separate rooms that are lockable from the inside. So, if the unisex toilet is NOT self contained, I suspect there are grounds for legal action. Not necessarily because women are being discriminated because of their sex but because the employer is in breach of the regulations.
Hope that makes sense!
That is extremely helpful, JL thank you.
Dusty
Thanks again, JL.
I have now posted on this 😊
Dusty
Understandably this gets to us all.
What you all need is a quick training course.
Ladies and gentlemen, here is a 3 minute explanation of gender ideology. Please pay close attention as there will be questions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33-fVsL5Kdc&t=88s
😊
Dusty
😆 thanks for cheering us up Dusty.
Hear, hear.
Glad to be of service 😎
Dusty
Yet again you are way ahead of the curve with your grip on reality JL. Thank you.
But even as I read things the way I do this has changed. I am wondering what's true, what's being altered and twisted. It's way beyond 'left' or 'right'. Did something actually happen? How should I respond? We have lost a key element of public record and access to factual and informed resources - that long list of publications says it all. We won't be looking back on news reports with any kind of assurance as they'll all have 'content warning: this is all the deluded fantasy of a broken organisation' on them. Almost everything is now steeped in propaganda. The last century or two of news production followed vaguely agreed rules and comparing news reports you could identify the main thread that ran through them all. We all became connected to information and it was beamed around the world and into our homes in seconds. But I am struggling to fathom this new world I live in - it's like AI-generated 'product' being so dangerous because it's similar to what could be true, but how can we verify it. It's got enough elements to be plausible, but could be true or could be totally invented, or a smattering of both, open to debate. Yes, it's dangerous, and how can we counter it?
There are so many disturbing elements to all of these reports. I was misled by the lies that the murderer of Jorge Martin Carreno was a 'she' so it's another nasty surprise today. I was wondering how 'she' with 'her' clear severe mental health issues had been allowed to continue the trajectory until 'she' murdered that man. Then the actual facts start to come out after outrage over the continual fabrication of 'realities'. That man and his multiple alternative names was known to mental health services, which seem to be in such a state no one is safe - no member of the public or service user. He was also known to 'gender services' who obviously oversaw his mental illness and severe delusions as some form of fun gender rights experiment and oversaw giving him hormones. They officially repackaged a male sexual fetish into some created gender freedom to relieve his 'dysphoria'. Those services are taking deluded and deviant people and putting rocket-fuel in them, then sending them out into communities as ticking gender time-bombs. How are they not also responsible for this? He was known to services who rubber-stamped this psychosis and sent him out to live his best life, screw everyone else. Most photos are him smirking. Every institution that has been normalising this gender shite has allowed this. No, that weirdo who is putting others at risk is nice and fluffy and you MUST be nice to him.
It's so hard to pick out truth from the massive web of lies being deliberately spun daily all in service of Genderology. The Gruaniad only edited that story after a huge backlash. For those of you unaware it's now all kicked off again, this time it's yet another Gruaniad journo telling them and Kath Viner to stop lying and misleading readers. She was misled herself:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/26/louise-tickle-boycott-guardian-cat-killer-transgender/
I don’t post much anymore as I find myself repeating the same old shit
Quite frankly I’m glad I don’t have the big red button in front of me because I’d push the fucking thing
I know how you feel. I try not to read these newsletters before bed because it makes me mad and gives me nightmares.
It's the women who are complicit in this mind bending bullshit that amaze me! Like Nicola Braganza in last week's newsletter, those female swimmers grouped smiling around "Meghan" Cortez-Fields while he breezes in and steals their medals. Are they scared what will happen if they make a fuss, confused about what to do, or are they actually so stupid that they don't see the self-harm?
Yes and yes
Should have added another yes
But also likely afraid of the reaction of their female peers if they’re insufficiently “kind.” They’ve already lost the title; must they lose their ‘friends’ too? Answer, from my vantage point: yes, they’re 100% worth losing, but it took some pain and growth to get here. Those girls are his fresh victims, and they might just be in shock.
This movement is revealing the dark depths of male loathing, resentment, ignorance and fear of women in all western (and other) societies today, whether these misogynists are the depraved killers and cheats who assume female names and 'identities' or their powerful apologists in the media etc who clearly revel in pinning such depravity on women and in celebrating men beating women in sports and forcing the women and girls who are beaten to smile in the presence of their cheating, frankly psychotic abusers. Masculinity is in VERY bad shape indeed if it has to go to these lengths to abuse and belittle women. Either these are the death throes of the patriarchy or of humanity. I'm fighting for the former, for my sons as much as for my daughter, and all the other sons and daughters, but I am running out of hope.
Yes it's like Dr Frankenstein has been in his lab playing around with incels, Andrew Tate, male sexual fetish, violence, paedophilia and good old fashioned misogyny and come up with ... Trans Ideology.
Exactly, and the left-wing political effery in the US (reading Kara Dansky's 'Reckoning' at the moment) that seems in part at least due to their terror of another Trump presidency, and their reliance on Big Trans money, conditional on supporting the ideology.
I’m reading the same book right now. It’s brutally energizing, isn’t it?
Just superb and energizing, yes. SO reassuring that someone as gutsy and brilliant as Kara is fighting so hard on our side. The Democrats will listen and heed her advice or lose.
I love that analogy.
I see that Dave aka 'Katie' has been busy with getting some work done on his face,at least that would have given the LGB youth that he stalks and sexually harasses some respite. 'Katie' is a dirty old man perve.