That 'Genderbread' nonsense angers me more than I dare put into words in polite society. It is so pathetic. And yet, it seems almost ubiquitous these days on the internet and on Powerpoint presentations... and now we see it peddled in government circles.
So often we are told that 'biological sex doesn't exist' or that 'genital preferences are transphobic' or 'don't matter'. and yet this diagram seems to instruct us differently. There is a dashed line pointing to the 'genital area' of the figure and it is labelled 'sex'. So, which way do these people want this? Does sex exist or not? Is it genital-based after all, despite what many 'University' students are being taught and then proclaiming loudly and aggressively? Did Judith Butler sacrifice themselves on the altar of nonsensical, pseudo-intellectual language construction for nothing? What IS the airspeed velocity of a swallow?
In other 'genital area news' the diagram implies that there are three sexes - as they have used the transgender symbol to annotate this entirely and completely unimportant and insignificant (according to activists) genital area. Male, female symbols combined plus the mysterious 'third sex' of transgender.
This all adds up to me thinking the following:
1. That these dangerous clowns literally have no literal idea what they are talking about.
2. They are making it up as they are going along.
3. That these people are utter dimwitted, weasel-like fuckwits - clueless and floundering in a sea of utterly insane, ideological drivel.
Absolutely right, Moley! How on earth are supposedly sensible grown-up people swallowing this obvious bum-wash. That they're in government is terrifying. Not only is the emperor naked, he's waving his dick in their faces!
Well, the very reasonable Nikki Da Costa is flagging all of this up, thank you1 Hopefully she is not the only Civil Servant who understands biology, although the others are cowed by the (very frightening!) insane Trans supporters!
To me Transgenderism seems like what you get when you let a bunch of arts graduates who haven't studied any science since they were about 16 and never liked it to begin with decide what makes a man a man and a woman a woman with no one ever thinking "maybe we should crack open a biology textbook".
Also, I can't help but wonder if the decision to distinguish between sex and gender in feminist discourse has backfired somewhat because most people in my experience use the terms interchangeably.
If you've ever rolled your eyes at conservatives stating that "there are only two genders" whilst thinking "you silly billy, gender is a spectrum don't you know", then been equally irritated when leftists say "sex is a spectrum" you'll know where I'm coming from...
To be honest, it would be quicker to list the things at which I do not roll my eyes these days in this Clown World.
The use of the word 'gender' is interesting to me. It 'should' be pertaining to sex of groups or populations (or words in certain languages, of course), and not individuals where their sex is concerned. Technically. This new, vague gossamer-like, ever-changing and malleable definition that we have thrown at us from all side has become meaningless. And it is listed on official forms for jobs, positions and all sorts of documents where accuracy is paramount.
So you ask them 'what do you mean by 'gender'?', and one is met with.... *crickets*.
It is pandering to an extreme degree, to a nebulous concept that many delicate, wafer-thin, blue-haired people with egos the size of an area the size of Wales, and personal demands of about the same magnitude, are pushing as if their lives depend on it - and claim that this is indeed the case - that their very existence depends on our 'validating' thems and theys. (Which is clearly false)
So, to (eventually) answer your wondering point... 'probably'. But I think many others have run with the concept and given it a life of its own.
Just a little tag on. I personally know TRA who used sex and gender interchangeably in conversion with me and who was actively hostile when I asked him to make a distinction because I just couldn't follow his arguments otherwise. As far as he was concerned TWAW, Women are Female, so TWAF :(
The war on women really is raging worldwide and it seems as if it is getting worse. Women still have the vote however, and we must let the politicians know that they will not get our votes if they support this war. If needs be, we must start up gender critical parties and put up our own candidates.
I wonder if the museum of science panders to creationists in the same way it does the gender cult? Do they have a bible on display as "literal proof" that the earth was created in 6 days by a big bearded guy in the sky?
Bev Jackson is right to say that the Govt and civil service are being yet again lobbied by outright TRA groups peddling their propaganda - what we want to know is WHO is allowing THEM such unlimited access?? they have replaced Stonedeaf as if nothing has changed - these publicly paid staff need to account to some tax payers.
The lobbyists must be laughing their socks off at the gullibility and stupidity of these officials who are even paying for them to push their infantile but dangerous ideas on us. The media need to take this on seriously.
As a Canadian I'm politically homeless. We don't have any politicians that aren't captured. The Conservatives, a bunch of anti-abortion climate-change denialists, fielded a TiM in my riding. The NDP and Greens are as pro-gender woo as the Liberals. I think ordinary Canadians would mostly think transology is a pile of dung, but the legislation has been introduced by stealth. We don't have the same iron-clad rights protections as the US in our constitution - any right can be limited as long as it is "demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society", and that's not difficult to do. I have to hand it to them - the TRAs have been masterful strategists.
They haven't been masterful strategists, their cult leaders have been with their billions of dollars. When we live in societies in which money and power are worshipped as gods, can we be surprised at what the sociopaths who garner money and power will do?
I feel exactly the same. Here in Scotland we have a bogus "independence" party in thrall to the gender cult. People vote for them in the hope of Scottish nationalism and regaining membership of the EU but I'm not sure how many realise they're being sold a lie. It's got so bad many are resorting to supporting the reactionary fool Johnson as all other political parties have jumped on the woke bandwagon. The politically homeless should form a party of our own!
Too true. Wish the Scottish electorate would wake up to this nonsense with its very real inherent dangers to women and children .I've always voted Labour but voted Tory at the last Scottish election ,for the first time ever.
I am "outing" myself before 19th Dec: I have volunteered many times in recent months at my dinghy sailing club. While we are watching the races from the Committee Boat I tell my fellow volunteers a little - read "a lot"! - about my life with my trans ex-H. I am now fearless: I know the law, I know the psychiatry, I know the (planned) escalation of taunting and intimidation by my ex-H, I know the biological science, I know the politics and the campaign tactics of the other side. 15 years after he dropped his bomshell "It's true. I'm a transsexual" I now have all the tools to say to the world: "Well, you're mad, pal. And I want all the world to know that". Ends.
Beyond evil. I have no words to adequately express the anger and outrage I feel just now ,especially with both the Canadian and Scottish Governments ( I'm Scottish ).. They're completely beyond redemption in my opinion. This destruction of civilised society and therefore humanity cannot be sustained without a complete descent into barbarism ,which we we can see has already started.👎👎👎👎👎👎 So glad I'm old !
Just a reminder to the blind that Glinner blamed "bullies" for Artys actions, and Arty weponised suicide to demonize women, then blamed booze. Typical wankers.
How very arrogant that you call those who do not agree with you 'blind'. I don't normally feed the trolls but I'm breaking my rule to say I'm far from blind. And I see very clearly that Graham is a man of the greatest integrity and courage. I may not always agree with him but I will forever love & respect him for engaging so bravely in this fight for women's rights and the safety of children. He didn't need to. He could so easily have looked the other way and kept his mouth shut. Like SO many other prominent celebrities have done. But he didn't. He stepped up, used his platform and his talent, and put his head high above the parapet. It has cost him dearly but he has never given up. He gives so many feminists (myself included) and LGB activists a voice and a platform and has been hugely instrumental in fighting the lunacy that is gender identity ideology. If you can't see that, I suggest you are the blind one. And as I do not intend to engage any further with someone who can express such vitriol towards one of the best men I know, I'll bid you goodnight and get back to ignoring you.
You have posted basically the same thing for several days now. I don't know what this particular bee in your bonnet is about, but it clearly isn't gaining any traction. At the moment, you are coming across as being another Tezzy. If you've got a problem, state it clearly.
You know what ive been up to, but conveniently can not comprehend? Sounds like you have a penis. Im not the one here for notoriety hiding behind women and children as a gimmick, thats Glinner and Arty. Ive clearly stated that yall be dumb and desperate with all this fawning over more failed men.
I've never denied I'm a man, and I don't actually see what difference it makes.
I don't know anything about Arty Morty, though I did read a screenshot of a particularly unpleasant post he made regarding women and bloodlust - is that the one you are referring to? I think I posted somewhere that his comment was rubbish, because if women wanted AGPs dead, then there would be a very big body-count by now. However, I don't know why he posted it, nor why he felt he needed to make such a weak apology afterwards - "sorry, I was drunk" is never an apology, it's an excuse. It often means that the person has shown their real self, and for a person who claims to support women's rights to say that is very strange (at best). I will always weigh anything I might see by this person in light of that post.
Having said that, I have no reason to distrust Graham, and I'm not going to start simply because he has defended a friend. Loyalty has its own value, and he was clearly hurt and conflicted when he did his one-man "Mess" last week. On balance, my assessment is that Graham is doing far more good than harm to the cause of women, children, and gender critical men at the moment. From my point of view, you seem to have taken one datum and developed it into a very complex pattern that has no substance. I can understand your anger at Arty Morty - what he wrote, and that crap apology, are indistinguishable from what women have heard from abusive men time after time - but I don't think Graham has earned the regular digs you are aiming at him.
Oh, he sure has. They are cut from the same cloth. Glinner blamed "bullies" for Artys actions and is implying we have compassion, while Arty is weponising suicide to demonize women, then blames the booze. "I like my friend, so FU" is essentially "bros before hoes". Clearly EVERYTHING is about males and what a male want or theyll die/cry/manipulate. Women and children suffer daily, women for a lifetime, and we must "be kind" to these wankers and pretend theyre fuckin heros? Bullshit. Obviously they care sooo much. Glinner is desperate to work in entertainment and Arty wants notoriety.
Anyone can help their appearance by not being a total creep. As I've aged I've noticed that people who are horrible human beings tend to have their proclivities written on their mugs. No one has a portrait in his attic.
That 'Genderbread' nonsense angers me more than I dare put into words in polite society. It is so pathetic. And yet, it seems almost ubiquitous these days on the internet and on Powerpoint presentations... and now we see it peddled in government circles.
So often we are told that 'biological sex doesn't exist' or that 'genital preferences are transphobic' or 'don't matter'. and yet this diagram seems to instruct us differently. There is a dashed line pointing to the 'genital area' of the figure and it is labelled 'sex'. So, which way do these people want this? Does sex exist or not? Is it genital-based after all, despite what many 'University' students are being taught and then proclaiming loudly and aggressively? Did Judith Butler sacrifice themselves on the altar of nonsensical, pseudo-intellectual language construction for nothing? What IS the airspeed velocity of a swallow?
In other 'genital area news' the diagram implies that there are three sexes - as they have used the transgender symbol to annotate this entirely and completely unimportant and insignificant (according to activists) genital area. Male, female symbols combined plus the mysterious 'third sex' of transgender.
This all adds up to me thinking the following:
1. That these dangerous clowns literally have no literal idea what they are talking about.
2. They are making it up as they are going along.
3. That these people are utter dimwitted, weasel-like fuckwits - clueless and floundering in a sea of utterly insane, ideological drivel.
4. See previous answers.
Thank you for attending my TEDRant.
Absolutely right, Moley! How on earth are supposedly sensible grown-up people swallowing this obvious bum-wash. That they're in government is terrifying. Not only is the emperor naked, he's waving his dick in their faces!
'her' dick, surely?
😁
Well, the very reasonable Nikki Da Costa is flagging all of this up, thank you1 Hopefully she is not the only Civil Servant who understands biology, although the others are cowed by the (very frightening!) insane Trans supporters!
To me Transgenderism seems like what you get when you let a bunch of arts graduates who haven't studied any science since they were about 16 and never liked it to begin with decide what makes a man a man and a woman a woman with no one ever thinking "maybe we should crack open a biology textbook".
Also, I can't help but wonder if the decision to distinguish between sex and gender in feminist discourse has backfired somewhat because most people in my experience use the terms interchangeably.
If you've ever rolled your eyes at conservatives stating that "there are only two genders" whilst thinking "you silly billy, gender is a spectrum don't you know", then been equally irritated when leftists say "sex is a spectrum" you'll know where I'm coming from...
To be honest, it would be quicker to list the things at which I do not roll my eyes these days in this Clown World.
The use of the word 'gender' is interesting to me. It 'should' be pertaining to sex of groups or populations (or words in certain languages, of course), and not individuals where their sex is concerned. Technically. This new, vague gossamer-like, ever-changing and malleable definition that we have thrown at us from all side has become meaningless. And it is listed on official forms for jobs, positions and all sorts of documents where accuracy is paramount.
So you ask them 'what do you mean by 'gender'?', and one is met with.... *crickets*.
It is pandering to an extreme degree, to a nebulous concept that many delicate, wafer-thin, blue-haired people with egos the size of an area the size of Wales, and personal demands of about the same magnitude, are pushing as if their lives depend on it - and claim that this is indeed the case - that their very existence depends on our 'validating' thems and theys. (Which is clearly false)
So, to (eventually) answer your wondering point... 'probably'. But I think many others have run with the concept and given it a life of its own.
You could easily substitute 'gender' for 'sex based stereotypes' and retain most of the meaning.
Only the size of Wales? Are you sure their egos are that small?
Hmmm.... Ok - How about 'an area the size of Greenland, the size of Wales'?
Definitively!
Got there in the end!
Just a little tag on. I personally know TRA who used sex and gender interchangeably in conversion with me and who was actively hostile when I asked him to make a distinction because I just couldn't follow his arguments otherwise. As far as he was concerned TWAW, Women are Female, so TWAF :(
Maybe we need to start shouting, "Women are Trans Women! No debate!" just to confuse them.
Moley, once again...you magnificent bastard!
Ha!
ANTI-REALITY agenda as pushed by the techno-religious cultists.
👏👏👏👏👏
Two things how do we support Canadian GC people?
And Edinburgh Rape Crisis just minutes ago has advertised for volunteer counsellors who 'identify as women'
Oh and a third thing because I'm a bitch - Morgane Oger really is losing their hair....
It's OK to say 'his' on here.
He's one of the ugliest motherf**kers I've ever seen. Some people should be required to wear a paper bag over their heads in public.
He looks like Austin Powers in drag.
Are they finding that counsellors who are women don't want to work there? What other provision for women who are women is there in Edinburgh?
Why can't they be done with it and rename it Edinburgh Trans Rape Crisis Centre.
There is no where else for women to go in Edinburgh for rape counselling. I really think that we'll have to set up a new service.
I am losing my hair ... and I endorse this message.
The war on women really is raging worldwide and it seems as if it is getting worse. Women still have the vote however, and we must let the politicians know that they will not get our votes if they support this war. If needs be, we must start up gender critical parties and put up our own candidates.
Good idea👍👍
I wonder if the museum of science panders to creationists in the same way it does the gender cult? Do they have a bible on display as "literal proof" that the earth was created in 6 days by a big bearded guy in the sky?
Bev Jackson is right to say that the Govt and civil service are being yet again lobbied by outright TRA groups peddling their propaganda - what we want to know is WHO is allowing THEM such unlimited access?? they have replaced Stonedeaf as if nothing has changed - these publicly paid staff need to account to some tax payers.
I know! I tell my husband that these people aren't bought, they PAY and pay handsomely to push this utter crap.
The lobbyists must be laughing their socks off at the gullibility and stupidity of these officials who are even paying for them to push their infantile but dangerous ideas on us. The media need to take this on seriously.
As a Canadian I'm politically homeless. We don't have any politicians that aren't captured. The Conservatives, a bunch of anti-abortion climate-change denialists, fielded a TiM in my riding. The NDP and Greens are as pro-gender woo as the Liberals. I think ordinary Canadians would mostly think transology is a pile of dung, but the legislation has been introduced by stealth. We don't have the same iron-clad rights protections as the US in our constitution - any right can be limited as long as it is "demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society", and that's not difficult to do. I have to hand it to them - the TRAs have been masterful strategists.
They haven't been masterful strategists, their cult leaders have been with their billions of dollars. When we live in societies in which money and power are worshipped as gods, can we be surprised at what the sociopaths who garner money and power will do?
I feel exactly the same. Here in Scotland we have a bogus "independence" party in thrall to the gender cult. People vote for them in the hope of Scottish nationalism and regaining membership of the EU but I'm not sure how many realise they're being sold a lie. It's got so bad many are resorting to supporting the reactionary fool Johnson as all other political parties have jumped on the woke bandwagon. The politically homeless should form a party of our own!
Too true. Wish the Scottish electorate would wake up to this nonsense with its very real inherent dangers to women and children .I've always voted Labour but voted Tory at the last Scottish election ,for the first time ever.
Dear Graham.
I am "outing" myself before 19th Dec: I have volunteered many times in recent months at my dinghy sailing club. While we are watching the races from the Committee Boat I tell my fellow volunteers a little - read "a lot"! - about my life with my trans ex-H. I am now fearless: I know the law, I know the psychiatry, I know the (planned) escalation of taunting and intimidation by my ex-H, I know the biological science, I know the politics and the campaign tactics of the other side. 15 years after he dropped his bomshell "It's true. I'm a transsexual" I now have all the tools to say to the world: "Well, you're mad, pal. And I want all the world to know that". Ends.
Good for you 👋👋👋👋
Thank you!
I'm livid .
Beyond evil. I have no words to adequately express the anger and outrage I feel just now ,especially with both the Canadian and Scottish Governments ( I'm Scottish ).. They're completely beyond redemption in my opinion. This destruction of civilised society and therefore humanity cannot be sustained without a complete descent into barbarism ,which we we can see has already started.👎👎👎👎👎👎 So glad I'm old !
Just a reminder to the blind that Glinner blamed "bullies" for Artys actions, and Arty weponised suicide to demonize women, then blamed booze. Typical wankers.
How very arrogant that you call those who do not agree with you 'blind'. I don't normally feed the trolls but I'm breaking my rule to say I'm far from blind. And I see very clearly that Graham is a man of the greatest integrity and courage. I may not always agree with him but I will forever love & respect him for engaging so bravely in this fight for women's rights and the safety of children. He didn't need to. He could so easily have looked the other way and kept his mouth shut. Like SO many other prominent celebrities have done. But he didn't. He stepped up, used his platform and his talent, and put his head high above the parapet. It has cost him dearly but he has never given up. He gives so many feminists (myself included) and LGB activists a voice and a platform and has been hugely instrumental in fighting the lunacy that is gender identity ideology. If you can't see that, I suggest you are the blind one. And as I do not intend to engage any further with someone who can express such vitriol towards one of the best men I know, I'll bid you goodnight and get back to ignoring you.
Beautifully put, if I may JL. Your words cheered me.
Ah thank you, Moley. I don't normally feed the trolls but I thought that needed saying. Glad you're cheered!
I may have exaggerated saying 'cheered'... Perhaps more 'satisfied'! Still, well said!
Thanks, JL. I note that there is a little "Banned" at the side of the name now!
Well said ,JL. Thank you for that.!!👍👍👍👍
Thank you, Susan! x
You have posted basically the same thing for several days now. I don't know what this particular bee in your bonnet is about, but it clearly isn't gaining any traction. At the moment, you are coming across as being another Tezzy. If you've got a problem, state it clearly.
You know what ive been up to, but conveniently can not comprehend? Sounds like you have a penis. Im not the one here for notoriety hiding behind women and children as a gimmick, thats Glinner and Arty. Ive clearly stated that yall be dumb and desperate with all this fawning over more failed men.
I've never denied I'm a man, and I don't actually see what difference it makes.
I don't know anything about Arty Morty, though I did read a screenshot of a particularly unpleasant post he made regarding women and bloodlust - is that the one you are referring to? I think I posted somewhere that his comment was rubbish, because if women wanted AGPs dead, then there would be a very big body-count by now. However, I don't know why he posted it, nor why he felt he needed to make such a weak apology afterwards - "sorry, I was drunk" is never an apology, it's an excuse. It often means that the person has shown their real self, and for a person who claims to support women's rights to say that is very strange (at best). I will always weigh anything I might see by this person in light of that post.
Having said that, I have no reason to distrust Graham, and I'm not going to start simply because he has defended a friend. Loyalty has its own value, and he was clearly hurt and conflicted when he did his one-man "Mess" last week. On balance, my assessment is that Graham is doing far more good than harm to the cause of women, children, and gender critical men at the moment. From my point of view, you seem to have taken one datum and developed it into a very complex pattern that has no substance. I can understand your anger at Arty Morty - what he wrote, and that crap apology, are indistinguishable from what women have heard from abusive men time after time - but I don't think Graham has earned the regular digs you are aiming at him.
Oh, he sure has. They are cut from the same cloth. Glinner blamed "bullies" for Artys actions and is implying we have compassion, while Arty is weponising suicide to demonize women, then blames the booze. "I like my friend, so FU" is essentially "bros before hoes". Clearly EVERYTHING is about males and what a male want or theyll die/cry/manipulate. Women and children suffer daily, women for a lifetime, and we must "be kind" to these wankers and pretend theyre fuckin heros? Bullshit. Obviously they care sooo much. Glinner is desperate to work in entertainment and Arty wants notoriety.
https://mobile.twitter.com/artymortyarty/status/1460015615696154627
I've stated my opinion. I respect yours. Time will tell which of us is correct.
Clearly it's no longer a " science museum ". Should rename itself woke fantasy museum instead..People need to object strongly to this.!!
People can’t help their appearance much. But there’s also that thing about getting the face you deserve...
Anyone can help their appearance by not being a total creep. As I've aged I've noticed that people who are horrible human beings tend to have their proclivities written on their mugs. No one has a portrait in his attic.
During the second wave, many feminists equated the treatment of women and female animals.