75 Comments

Good news indeed. Women’s sports dearly need its women to down tools, and walk away. When no one competes except dudes and a few allies (who are happy to keep losing apparently) then it will show it for the farce it is. I’m proud of these women for standing up. Thank you! It’s truly sad that it’s come to this, but we knew it would.

Expand full comment

Thank you as always JL.

Well done to all the women standing up and saying no. I was especially cheered by the fact that the audience applauded Lynne when she walked off.

And today both The Times and The Telegraph are reporting that "at least four clubs playing in a women’s football league in Yorkshire have pulled out of matches against a team that fielded a trans woman" - needless to say he is threatening to sue for discrimination!

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/06ffb3aa-87dd-11ee-947e-24524bf233d8?shareToken=86ed9d1872fbd4c369a3b386823d79e6

Expand full comment

Surely it's good if the transsexual male player sues- it'll expose the issue for the farce that it is. So-called inclusivity, could never trump theactual safety of players. The league should be sued for failure of duty of care towards the injured player!!

Expand full comment
founding

I'm in the United States, and the issues that arise in court might not be what you expect (I assume the legal issues are similar in England). Because gays won their rights on the basis of their identities, trans people are making legal strides because of their identities (in this case, "gender identity"). The difference between gays and trans people, of course, is that when a gay man says "I am attracted to my own sex", there is no evidence to the contrary, and no reason to disbelieve him. But when a trans woman says "I am a woman", there is a lot of evidence to the contrary (his body). But judges aren't seeing it that way. All they can see is that trans people are being discriminated against for how they FEEL, and that's a legal no-no now. That trans women have physical advantages over real women is a complication that the courts don't want to look at. If judges were smart, they would make their judgements based on reality, not on identity. So instead of comparing trans people to gay people, they would compare trans people to, say, old people claiming to be young, white people claiming to be black (or vice versa), or mentally disturbed people claiming to be Napoleon.

Expand full comment

The CEO responsibility is to ensure that the charity’s mission statement reaches its target audience ie WOMEN , in language all ethnic females understand. These two narcissists are using endometriosis as a Trojan horse.

Expand full comment

Yes. The Charity Commission website shows it is only a local charity, run by 6 Trustees, and has 5 volunteers. Income in 2021 was a bit over £3,000. income in 2022 was about £8,000. Is this genuuine... or just a front for TRA propaganda...?

Expand full comment

Thanks JL! our moment of sun shine! Great to hear that about woman’s hour, i often have the radio on but missed that one. I will listen to it and enjoy a brief moment where the bbc seems to actually be ok. Although i think that sometimes the bbc allows this every so often so they can make the claim they are ‘balanced’ in this ‘debate’. Debate my arse, biological sex is not a debate. Its about as much a debate as whether the earth is flat. We shouldn’t have to pretend its a debate ffs. This whole culture has somehow managed to unlearn so many things and they call it ‘progressive’! Progressive my white male middle class arse! Ha ha. Woops off again, thanks JL, read you next week for some more anger/jubilation!

Expand full comment

This made me laff , only time my radio is on is when I’m going out

Alexa play kingdom fm , the dogs must be like ‘ Alexa stfu ‘😂

Expand full comment
Dec 2, 2023·edited Dec 2, 2023

hey Petal, i wrote this a bit ago and put it on the u tube. I dedicated it to your little Petal out of love and solidarity. Have a nice weekend

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cJ282s1afNw

ps you have to click on the…… more thingy next to the title

Expand full comment

I pressed buttons and saw it , thank you cb 😊

Expand full comment

Fabulous , I did comment ,

Ps I couldn’t find the …. More thingy next to the title , don’t underestimate my stupidity on tinternet

But that was very sweet of you to think of her

Tis a tad snowy up here but my very kind friends dug me out this morning

Expand full comment

Goodness me Petal, snowed in! how exciting! We might get one day of snow followed by a week of horrible sludge here. I suppose actual snow that actually causes disruption probably loses its appeal pretty quickly though. Have a nice weekend Petal

Expand full comment

A good 4 inches , ooer 😂

Same to you and yours cb

Snow up here is a pita , however my arsehole neighbours are still building a shed in the pitch black ! We’re tough af up here , my big coat is still no oot lol

Expand full comment

goodness Petal what i’d do for a good 4 inches, could really help with making the festivities really magical. Ha ha Petal, oh dear i’m little tipsy again!

Expand full comment

Many thanks for some cheering news JL- and this is a genuine thank you 😄. Plus some Glinner to watch, brilliant.

Expand full comment

My new favourite phrase is “Bugger off buttercup”. The closing videos make my day.

Expand full comment

Jodie PhD student identifying herself as a “CIS” heterosexual. Captured much. But more importantly, I’ve just searched some academic papers on the subject and this is the defining statement. “Is a reproductive disorder in which endometrial tissue is located outside the uterus”. And “Endometrium is the inner epithelial layer of the mammalian uterus”. Had to check for my own sanity when this PhD student is telling us it is not a gynaecological problem. The question is who is funding this deranged woman’s PhD and who will peer review her papers? Who will publish them? Who will take her seriously? Who will correct the utter tosh that will be in them? Can anyone get their hands on a PhD these days? Where is the intellectual scrutiny? The very fact that all she hears when people make logical and reasoned arguments is “transphobia” and “hate” suggests to me that she is not a PhD candidate and that scientific research is beyond her capabilities. The nasty fingerprints of trans activists are everywhere. Thanks to Emma Barton for showing the absurdity of these two chancers.

Expand full comment
Nov 21, 2023·edited Nov 21, 2023

Who will peer review it? The same fools who salivated over the academic hoax that Pluckrose and friends played few years ago. This shit will go on and on ad bloody nauseam.

Expand full comment

Yes the Grievance Studies Hoax including a slightly rewritten chapter from Mein Kampf which was published

Dusty

Expand full comment

Hey Jemima QC, like all academic papers captured by all this shit it will be perved reviewed by the usual team of self identified experts. Sorry that is really shit, but i’ve decided to throw the towel in and i’m on my second beer! woops!

Expand full comment

Perv reviewed, I like it. Enjoy the beers.

Expand full comment

The interview and the entire debacle is a farce, it must be a parody, but sadly not. Jodie, "cis (sic) heterosexual woman", behaves like a turkey looking forward to Christmas and the bloke she's taken on as CEO, like the manipulative liar he is. He was employed to make a point, allowing her to demonstrate the sincerity of her allyship and use of inclusive language, though clearly isn't bothered that she has a CEO who excludes the word 'woman'. Endometriosis is a condition that only affects women, regardless of what they call themselves. Trans men are not men in the same way that every woman isn't a man, as Jodie and her CEO very well know.

I laughed out loud when he was asked how he'd feel about a non trans person being the CEO of a trans charity. He sidestepped that and then told the truth when he referred to Nancy Kelley having been CEO of Stonewall. She isn't trans but Stonewall has effectively become a trans charity. I laughed again the when Emma asked him about his use of the word terf, and he attempted to suggest that it isn't intended only as a slur. Well, it certainly is when used by men like him. What a fucking joke.

As for Jodie and her PhD, I think her thesis is going to read like something of a joke too, especially if she isn't sure what kind of condition endometriosis is and who it affects. Not much evidence of academic rigour here, she should have gone for gender studies instead, where its absence is an advantage.

You're quite right when you say the "nasty fingerprints of trans activists are everywhere". Were they not, she wouldn't have described opposition to Richards' appointment in terms of hatred and transphobia. Case closed. She let herself off thinking about that by going straight to the abusive messages she has received. They are inexcusable, of course, but I hope Richards doesn't affect being too appalled, as a trans activist he's going to be aware of the charming messages and threats women receive from his fellow activists, even if not from a feminist like him.

Expand full comment

Having done a very cursory search according to some papers it can affect some girls born without a uterus, who are still female funnily enough, and some men. From what I can understand this is because of the usually very small proportion of those born with developmental differences. To then claim as Steph and Jodie have is disingenuous word play when it's such small numbers and therefore so many women are being overlooked and made invisible. Emma Barnett's point that in effect if you say, look this issue affects men too (even 0.000001%) then that's not such a great selling point. So it affects men? Great! We can fund it now.

Really worrying is the link that seems to be with men taking hormones, or 'replacement' therapy aka cross-sex hormones and the link with endo in men. Add that to the growing pile of unintended but obvious consequences of playing with your hormones with or without medical or quack supervision. So add that to what 'detransitioners' face.

Expand full comment

If I’ve got the right charity, it looks really small and doesn’t appear to have much in the way of paid employees (https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-search/-/charity-details/5148760/charity-overview - I also looked on their website) so I would’ve thought that at least he doesn’t get much financial compensation for the job. What he does get in spades, however, is a major sense of validation and no doubt he also finds it all rather bonerific.

Expand full comment

I don’t like to imagine too much about what he is getting out of this but I can’t help pondering WHY he is “passionate about endometriosis”. Weird. Just weird.

Expand full comment

A lot of them are absolutely obsessed with women's physical experiences, often to the point of fetishism. Look up 'trans menstruation' or take a look at this link https://periodaisle.com/blogs/all/6-transgender-women-talk-menstruation

Reddit has plenty of perverts recounting how they steal and wear used sanitary pads - yet another reason we don't want them in female toilets.

Expand full comment

The whole godamm thing is a fetish and we are being forced to participate in it. It's sexual abuse. Someone is going to cotton on to this and there will be law suits against these abusers.

Expand full comment

Yep, exactly this (being obsessed with women’s physical experiences). Why on earth we’re expected to validate these creepy fetishes I’ll never understand, and I’ll never understand the women who DO go along with it! Like, for example, the women who’ve let men “breastfeed” their babies! You’ve go to have something seriously wrong with you to allow that to happen.

One of the blokes even admitted he got off on it.

Expand full comment

Agreed. The handmaidens don't seem to realise that their 'Trans Pride' badges are actually subliminally flashing 'Please w**k over me'.

Expand full comment

Oh dear god. Revolting creeps.

Expand full comment

I reckon he’s getting attention and that means a lot to him. I bet he’d never even heard of endometriosis.

Expand full comment

Agree. Look how he went toe to toe with Milli Hill. I’ll have you know he searched on the web on three separate occasions for about two hours many years ago AND he printed some pages off, so there. He clearly is the bestest researcher on all women, all women’s issues and especially endo.

The very worrying thing is that these men pass themselves off as professionals, they do get places on boards and to 'advise' organisations, like Medical Royal Colleges, they are invited to Parliament and people do take them seriously.

Expand full comment

They are all weird Susan. Every single last one of them. Weird, weird weird.

Expand full comment

He isn't passionate about endometriosis, he's passionate about himself, and overjoyed that he's able to take full advantage of the freedom to supplant women the trans cult have been given. He might fetishise female reproductive biological apparatus and function, but he doesn't care about women or how women are affected by men like him. I'm sure he loves the idea that he can affect women, however.

He was able to take a position that should have been filled by a woman. His appointment is getting a lot of attention, something he's likely to be luxuriating in. Women have reacted angrily to it, but he still has it, and he can rely on plenty of people, including some women, rushing to cast him as the victim of bigotry and hatred. Then he'll be cheered on for being brave and groundbreaking. Yeah, a man getting things his way, truly groundbreaking.

Expand full comment
Nov 23, 2023·edited Nov 23, 2023

Although I expect he is a pervert etc, it seems to me this is about propaganda. He is 70 year old retiree. The Charity is small local, income 2021 about £3k, 2022 about £8K- not enough to pay him. 6 Trustees run it, and they have 5 volunteers (-who might even be the Trustees LOL). The point is, with that job title, he can now try comment on Womens Health issues to the media, politicians etc- and he is already on BBC Radio 4- don't care if they are criticised coz that bolsters their 'oh poor me' victim narrative. This whole thing is TRA propaganda!

Expand full comment

Have you heard the interview on Woman's Hour? It has a real thick dollop of local things for local people about it - apparently the criticisms are from 'abroad' so add xenophobia to this bunch. I have no idea why people with opinions from 'abroad' would be dismissed. I assume they mean people from the Isle of Wight... or perhaps Southampton :-)

This seems another case of someone not particularly skilled, qualified or experienced stumbling into a role, suddenly being senior with a high profile, then still thinking they can bluff their way through. With their 'passion' which apparently is enough. Thinking that doing something for two or three years is a long time and they are 'established'. It's a particular theme within EDI and charities in this area for some reason. Maybe because their degrees are all fluff and the industry is based on that.

Expand full comment

this is not a real charity- income 2021 £3K, 2022: £8K. Run by 6 Trustees, have 5 volunteers. CEO is 70 year old OAP, obvs unpaid. This is a Propaganda front

Expand full comment

Yes, and you would think there were some rules about this and that the Charity Commission might think bringing the word 'charity' into disrepute isn't such a great thing. Philanthropy can be a great force for good and this is not it. This lot are diluting the space and taking away from other charities. All the publicity and attention this bunch of pals have got has done actual damage and they are and will still play the victims. It appears to be purely to stroke their egos as 'people who do good'. I am legitimately furious when the public is distracted and misled as the fallout and lack of services affects the very people this bunch and others claim to help. There have been some very high-profile 'charity' failures and too many are exposed as little fiefdoms to target and harass others. Trying to get other legitimate charities shut down, with dodgy if not criminal people on their boards, run by zealots and those feathering their own nests.

I wonder what their income forecasts are for the next few years? Where are they getting funding from? What are they delivering? To whom? That man 'Steph' has his fingers in a few pies which is typical for these activists. How can he live on that? And he is being listened to, he does have and is being given the platforms. He was on BBC Radio 4 Woman's Hour FFS! I am glad he was as it exposes them yet again but it takes focus from genuine public information - what did any of us learn about endometriosis in that slot? No, we learnt yet again how trans activists are self-obsessed narcissists who cuckoo through our civil society. Other charities would give their right arm to have that exposure. I am sick of having to fight against disinformation - particularly within healthcare. And for women! All this 'cis' shite is yet again centring 'trans-identifiers'.

Expand full comment

Yes, I had a look at that page. Income 2022, about £8,300... not enough to pay even a part-timer... 6 Trustees run it, and have 5 volunteers... this is not a *real* organization. It seems to be a front, an excuse to give that guy a job-title, which would allow him to make public comments (using a female-sounding name) on Women's Health issues. This is for Propaganda, getting into the media- and it worked, coz they're on Radio 4 already, pushing their trans victim narraative...

Expand full comment

This couldn't have come sooner. Thank you, JL! 🙏

Best wishes for the week to you!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Hedy! Best wishes to you, too! 😘

Expand full comment

Thanks JL. Credit where it's due indeed. Emma Barnett is one of the few journalists who will emerge from all this insanity with her dignity.

Lynne Pinches is also an inspiration. It's scandalous that she has to stand down to make a point but it's a heroic sacrifice.

Expand full comment
author

😊

Expand full comment

Thanks very much JL. At this rate Woman's Hour is going to be for women!

Expand full comment
author

Lets hope so!

Expand full comment

Lovely to get the GNS as ever, JL, thanks.

Lots of hoorays to the women pool players, Emma Barnett, the great women at the Commons, Glinner and Ali Bee for her excellent song. And even more amazingly the BBC defended Ms Barnett after the TRAs piled on her. I would add to GNS the sterling performance of Kellie-Jay and the Mum at the school interview 😊

On a slight down note presumably you have heard about the attack on the women at Portland LWS on Sunday

Dusty

Expand full comment

As always 🌹

Very good piece on wings over Scotland ‘the safest people on earth ‘

Catch it quick before the comments are overrun by the usual drivel

Expand full comment
author

😘

Expand full comment

Just read through the stats on WOS Petal. That article should be sent to every MSP starting with our First Minister Youseless himself.

Expand full comment

I’m speaking off the cuff but wos is the most read website in the Scottish pretendy parliament

I’m sickened by the whole lot of them

They do not speak for me

Expand full comment

Unfortunately not one of them gaf

Expand full comment

Thanks ,JL. Great to see more and more sportswomen refusing to participate in the male fetish which is so damaging and dangerous to women .After all ,what do they have to lose ? If they continue to stay silent ,thereby supporting the mras , female sports will no longer exist and women will be the losers.Now is the time for EVERY female athlete ,in EVERY sport ,to say NO to this misogynistic movement which allows cheating men to steal women's medals and opportunities ,not just in sports but in every other sphere of life. Well done to all the brave women ( and MEN , especially Graham ❤️ ) who stand up against this ,often at great cost to themselves. They are HEROES 👍❤️👏💪. Well done ,JL xxx❤️

Expand full comment
author

😊

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2023·edited Nov 22, 2023Liked by JL

Thank you JL! What a delight. This is all a bit hard to take in. The Emma Barnett interview was astonishing. I will have to listen again - she ran rings around those people. That the man 'Steph' walked straight into her obvious logic trap to name the head of a trans organisation that isn't trans so he witters that 'Nancy Keely' was the head of Stonewall. Oops. He said it out loud. Stonewall has clearly focused on and attracted men like him to the exclusion of everyone else and who they formerly represented. She then has to point out the rather obvious point that it isn't a trans charity - thus revealing what we all know - the LGB has been entirely swallowed by the T. It's hard to listen to thick people who self-declare as 'activist' anything but another victory for Operation Let Them Speak. He is collecting hobbies like a train spotter - his 'interest' in endo is because he is a self-styled 'human rights activist'. Ooh, which human rights abuse will he look up in his big red book next. They cling to that odd point they think is a gotcha - sure have a competent woman leading a men's charity or a competent man leading a women's charity, but this isn't either of those is it, it's a man who believes himself to be a woman but isn't. And it all leads back to him having a chat over a coffee with the woman who set the charity up who is into genderology.

And no, not everyone in Portsmouth agrees with this. I cannot believe the stupidity of these bubble people. But, but everyone we know and speak to really likes us, that's the level of intelligence here, and everyone who disagrees with that woman is 'from abroad' (?) or she includes the everyone welcome category of 'transphobe'. Are these the village idiots? Why are we letting people 'study' for these 'courses'. Creating and letting them do PhDs? So they can become 'Professors' then inculcate other substandard minds to ride the lobby hobby horse. We've weakened the meaning of education and churning out these certificates in an ideology. Their only use is to become lecturers and EDI consultants to badly 'advise' charities and medical bodies. And try to change the law. Many people seem to do these courses to address their own identity and mental health issues, but it is not contributing to the fount of human knowledge.

‘Sex and Gender: A Contemporary Reader’ - actual women - actual proper academics - actually intelligent people. I salute you all and all those above standing up for your and our rights! :-)

Expand full comment

Great news. Well done to everyone standing up now....and the song, the song! All so bloomin' wonderful !!!! Well done especially to the brave lady who refused to play against the vile little cheat who should have been chased out of the contest at the start. I was going to suggest An Alternative Place for his cue, but that would be rude, so best not.

We are The Mothers, and if ANY of these Fruitcakes R Us believe they can defeat their Mums, they are even more Nutty than I already know they are. I think King Charles should order The Penis Song to be the new National Anthem. TeeHee... xxx

Expand full comment