21 Comments

So in other words, another heterosexual woman signs up to be in porn. I’d be surprised if gay men actually want to watch this but what do I know

Expand full comment
Apr 5, 2021Liked by mole at the counter

*reaches for the brain-bleach*

Expand full comment

same. I just want to vomit. I can't read any narrative like this without seeing junkies shooting dope. Trying to get the dose just right, more than last time to get them high as the last smaller dose did. Porn just uses other human beings instead of dope. That's how I got webcam spied, turned down a rich sex addict online who hit on me and was used to never hearing the word 'no' because of who he is. So he set out to ruin my life. These people are sick and the producers and site owners are just preying on the pornsick to make money. And so many of the trans rights folks are porn sick.

Expand full comment

Bleh... porn is boring. No intimacy. It's like an addiction where more extreme fetishises are need to get a fix.

Expand full comment

The bearded lady of Victorian times now XXX rated - what is wrong with these people!

Expand full comment

An “extra hole they get to use”...”on such an... intelligent and just decent” person.

Yeah, cos normally people with that”extra hole” are stupid and indecent, amirite? (I forget what the name for them is...)

This is advertising &, as the consumers are wanking to it, Pavlovian conditioning too.

Expand full comment

Trip worked in the porn industry prior to transition. The incidence of STD'S and HepC are rising and HIV is also a risk. 90% of female workers experience unscheduled rough sex 'set ups' which they go along with to maximise their chances of further emploment.Trip says " Manhood is NOT defined by genitals but by personality and energy!

Expand full comment

Feel a lot sick, tbh

Expand full comment

Yes Graham, it really is hellish. Who knows what must be going on in her head? Those who watch this stuff, we know what's going on in theirs - massive rushes of dopamine. They're addicts. Really, really sick. All porn should be banned. It is hateful. Literally.

Expand full comment

No. No it is not going to turn gay men onto vagina. Ugh the homophobia!

Expand full comment

How utterly revolting. I don't care if I upset anyone by saying this. Deviant people no longer hide away, but are treated almost as heroes. Hedonism On Steroids. Hey, folks, 'Acceptance Without Exception' though, 'Just Be Kind', 'Be Inclusive'.....

Expand full comment

Yes, the narcissism is off the scale. Which would be fine if they just wanted to circle-jerk each other off, but no, they have to make women feel excluded from their own spaces. I know this specific story is about a TM but 99.99999% of it tends to be the other way.

Expand full comment

Even the women who pretend they are men are wanting to make life deeply distressing for most women, wanting our language changed, 'mother' to 'birth parent', 'cervix/uterus owner' etc. It's all SO mad that most don't believe it, but mad it is, as in insanity. I've never let insane people dictate my life to me. The problem is, they've now got power, due to the £$millions being poured into Transworld by those who have their own agendas for this. Worst of all, it's the lies to children, that men are women, the men can have babies, etc.etc. This lunacy is destroying society and society is allowing this to happen. Most of these folks don't give a damn about anyone but themselves and their agenda. The fact that schools have been allowing them to use the children is soul-destroying, as is the way the medical profession is allowing this too. Hugely misogynistic and narcissistic....and yes, as you say, totally off the scale, but then, insanity IS off the scale, always.

Expand full comment

With you there. See my rant about TIFs tonite on Twitter.

Complicity.

Expand full comment

You are absolutely right.

Expand full comment

But guys, it’s sex-positive! And empowering!

/sarcasm

Expand full comment

There was an article in the 1990s in, I think, The Observer colour supplement about the porn industry. Possibly by Louis Theroux. It was so shocking and disturbing that parts of it are still seared into my mind. Women were subjected by men and animals to the most depraved, degrading acts imaginable.

Nothing I have read since comes anywhere close to it, although I have only read feminist articles about the porn industry since then so that might account for being spared further horrors.

I was worried about what I might read here but this is anodyne compared to what I read in that article in the 1990s.

Although the article refers to "gay porn" I strongly suspect that the audience is much more likely to be heterosexual, bisexual and pansexual men rather than gay men.

The porn industry was already as bad as it could get, in terms of the revolting behaviour depicted, well before the advent of the internet and, particularly, the world wide web.

*Does pornography still drive the internet?*

Tim Harford, 5 June 2019

"In the late 1970s, most videotape sales were pornographic."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-48283409

*The History of Pornography No More Prudish Than the Present*

11 Oct 2010

Pornography gets popular

For a long time, stag films remained stagnant, both in content and in quality. Then, in the 1970s, changing social mores opened the door for public showing of explicit films. The Internet and the invention of the digital camera lowered the barriers to porn-making so low that entire websites are now devoted solely to non-professional videos.

The shift from publically viewed stag films to privately viewed rentals and internet downloads drove changes in the types of acts shown on-screen. Privacy, Slade said, made men more willing to watch fetish films depicting specific, sometimes odd, sexual behavior. A 1994 Carnegie Mellon study of early porn on computer Bulletin Board Systems (a precursor to the World Wide Web), found that 48 percent of downloads were far outside the sexual mainstream, depicting bestiality, incest and pedophilia. Less than 5 percent of downloads depicted vaginal sex. This could have been because magazines and pornographic films had traditional sex covered, and people went to their computers for images they couldn't find elsewhere, Slade suggested."

https://www.livescience.com/8748-history-pornography-prudish-present.html

The big, NEW problems are not what the creation of porn involves but:

- how many more people are being exploited directly by the industry

- how easily accessible it is on the internet

- the impact this is having on adults and children, both male and female.

*A tenth of 12 to 13-year-olds fear they are porn addicts*

1 April 2015

"A TENTH of 12 to 13-year-old children in Scotland fear they have become addicted to watching pornography on their laptops and mobile phones.

According to an NSPCC ChildLine survey, one in five of nearly 700 youngsters, including 118 in Scotland, said they had seen pornographic images that had shocked or upset them.

The charity also says that 12 per cent of those surveyed said they had taken part in, or had made, a sexually explicit video.ChildLine says that viewing porn is “a part of everyday life” for many of the children who contact its helpline.

Elaine Chalmers, ChildLine Scotland area manager, said: “Our young people can access a wide range of online porn, far more easily today than even a couple of years ago. And as porn becomes more normalised, young people’s understanding of what a healthy relationship looks like becomes increasingly skewed.

“Contacts to ChildLine about porn have doubled in the last year. Discussion threads on our website message boards with porn in the title are viewed over 18,000 times per month.

“Young people who talk to us about porn tell us that it can make them feel depressed, insecure about their bodies and that it impacts on their self-esteem.

“Young people also tell us that porn is teaching boys that girls are for sexual gratification and girls that they must look and perform like ‘porn stars’ to be liked and valued by boys.”

https://www.thenational.scot/news/14897335.a-tenth-of-12-to-13-year-olds-fear-they-are-porn-addicts/

*Pornography Use Among Teens Statistics*

93 % of boys and 62% of girls are exposed to internet pornography before the age of 18.

70% of boys have spent at least 30 consecutive minutes looking at on-line porn on at least one occasion.

35% of boys have done this on at least ten occasions.

83% of boys have seen group sex on the internet.

67% of children admit to clearing their internet history to hide their online activity.

79% of accidental exposures to internet porn among kids take place in the home.

56% of divorce cases involve one party having an obsessive interest in online porn.

12% of websites on the internet are pornographic—Approximately 25 million websites.

2 of the top 100 websites on the internet are porn sites.

40 million Americans regularly visit pornographic websites.

2.5 billion emails per day are pornographic.

25% of search engine requests each day are pornography related—approximately 70 million per day.

Only 3% of pornographic websites require age verification.

The most popular day of the week for viewing pornography is Sunday.

10% of pornography users report being addicted.

The average age a child first sees internet pornography is 11.

70% of young men ages 18-24 visit pornographic websites on at least a monthly basis.

https://www.ypacenter.com/youth-pornography-addiction

I could go on, with references to the increase in the number of men rendered impotent by porn addiction, the predators targeting children in care and care-leavers, grooming them into the porn industry and prostitution, etc. etc.

With so many men being brainwashed into transgenderism via Sissy Porn and Sissy Hyno-Porn, and the accounts of female detransitioners who were groomed as teenagers by adult, transgender males, it is surely not surprising that there are "transmen" in the porn industry? Buck Angel's involvement and popularity was just a foretaste.

The description of Trip Richard's "performance" sounds very like the milder descriptions of degradation that I read in that 1990's article about the porn industry. What I do not know is whether it echos descriptions of male "bottoms" in porn. If it does, then this is just par for the course across the porn industry. If it does not, then I would agree that this says something specific about how females are "celebrated" in the porn industry.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Genderwang. Keeping track of the statistics is important, even though it just hurts and sickens ordinary people. Thank you for having a strong stomach.

Expand full comment

JFC! that is one very mentally disturbed woman -

Expand full comment

Urgh.

Its marked under fetish? Its heterosexual sex..

Expand full comment

It is pornography.... but as Becca says "What do I know?"

Expand full comment