From the Times reporting on the Tavistock: Examples of cases in the report include a girl from a family with a history of abuse of females. The mother’s anxiety about having a daughter was transmitted to her child, who resolved to change gender. Another girl felt “deeply guilty” after her brother died tragically, so she decided to give her parents “their son back” by changing gender. Some openly homophobic parents sought transition for their children because they were gay.”
It’s worth reading because her case is absolutely tragic. She is doing this in order to have sex with men in a way she feels will be safe- as a man- after everything she’s been through. It’s extremely sad.
Sorry to derail the article, there’s no place on here to chat and trade resources!
Tragic. From someone who knows medication and surgery is something that should only be done when absolutely necessary. Side effects and consequences are always there. Mumbo jumbo isn’t a valid reason for medication, intervention or surgery.
Thank you... I was sure I'd read before about some of the Tavistock whistleblowers saying they suspected some of the parents were abusive/paedophiles but couldn't find where.
So, my Twitter account has been removed without any warning. It was a very small account (under 200 followers & growing) mainly used to amplify news & info supporting the sex-based rights of women & girls & for stating the obvious! Apart from the sheer bloody cheek of it, my main thoughts are as to what this indicates. Does the removal of small & insignificant accounts such as mine mean that the purge has intensified because they feel emboldened, or is this because they know they are losing ground & see even the smallest of voices as a threat? (Apologies if this is the wrong thread)
So is a parent can know the true nature of their child, can we please start charging those parents as accessories or accomplices to crimes committed by their child who later on in life turns out to be a sadistic rapist, murderer, paedo etc
Oh God this is awful news.
Have you seen this, Graham? I know you wrote about Prinx Chiyo (the young woman trying to enter gay male spaces and to win Sexiest Gay England or something like that: https://sheridansinclair.substack.com/p/the-tragic-case-of-prinx-chiyo/comments
It’s worth reading because her case is absolutely tragic. She is doing this in order to have sex with men in a way she feels will be safe- as a man- after everything she’s been through. It’s extremely sad.
Sorry to derail the article, there’s no place on here to chat and trade resources!
'The Outcome is unknown' is repeated as a phrase.. this is chilling
Tragic. From someone who knows medication and surgery is something that should only be done when absolutely necessary. Side effects and consequences are always there. Mumbo jumbo isn’t a valid reason for medication, intervention or surgery.
Thank you... I was sure I'd read before about some of the Tavistock whistleblowers saying they suspected some of the parents were abusive/paedophiles but couldn't find where.
From a US reader—what is the Times story, please? It’s paywalled. Thank you.
The legalising of the ‘grooming’ of children by their mentally unstable parents and quacks. What a great ‘moral’ victory for all concerned.
I’m far from a perfect parent, but I’m sure most would agree what a loving parent is
They seek to limit their child's consumption of sugary drinks and food
They would not let them gorge on these foods, knowing what harm it can do to their young bodies
They seek to explain the risks of drugs and alcohol to their child
They would not give them a diet including these toxic substances
They seek help for the anorexic teen and institutionalise as a last resort
They would not triumph in the slow starvation of their child
They seek to limit their access to gaming seeing the harm it is doing to their child’s mental health
They would not let them play games night and day
They seek to encourage that their child takes learning seriously
They would not willingly restrict their access to education
They seek help for their child who is self-harming
They would not ensure easy access to instruments of self-harm
They seek to remove their child from a toxic relationship with a peer or another adult
They would not encourage that friendship
They want to seek out un-biased, professional support for their child and allow them to wear what they want
They would not sanction the mutilation of their young bodies by themselves or others
They give over their lives to raise their child to be a strong and healthy adult
They would not throw them to the wolves to ensure their own self-gratification
So, my Twitter account has been removed without any warning. It was a very small account (under 200 followers & growing) mainly used to amplify news & info supporting the sex-based rights of women & girls & for stating the obvious! Apart from the sheer bloody cheek of it, my main thoughts are as to what this indicates. Does the removal of small & insignificant accounts such as mine mean that the purge has intensified because they feel emboldened, or is this because they know they are losing ground & see even the smallest of voices as a threat? (Apologies if this is the wrong thread)
So is a parent can know the true nature of their child, can we please start charging those parents as accessories or accomplices to crimes committed by their child who later on in life turns out to be a sadistic rapist, murderer, paedo etc