It’s worth reading because her case is absolutely tragic. She is doing this in order to have sex with men in a way she feels will be safe- as a man- after everything she’s been through. It’s extremely sad.
Sorry to derail the article, there’s no place on here to chat and trade resources!
I am a nobody with a twitter and a blog account. Thanks to the editor of attitude magazine and the CEO of Mr Gay England wanting to take me down I have about 10,000 hits. I'm a nobody, why do they care so much? Are they scared? The best and easiest solution would have been to ignore me. But of course, no homosexual person must be allowed to assert their boundaries. It's absolutely chilling.
Tragic. From someone who knows medication and surgery is something that should only be done when absolutely necessary. Side effects and consequences are always there. Mumbo jumbo isn’t a valid reason for medication, intervention or surgery.
Thank you... I was sure I'd read before about some of the Tavistock whistleblowers saying they suspected some of the parents were abusive/paedophiles but couldn't find where.
Never mind. Found the story. The Daily Mail: a UK court held that parents can consent to hormone treatment for their minor child. (Unremarkable, really, that parents may consent to medical treatment for their child—however, I’m guessing that the original Times story contained references to minors whose treatment was initiated by homophobic parents preferring a trans kid to a gay/lesbian kid. I'd still like to see the Times story.)
Interestingly, this decision was handed down by a single justice, who sat on the panel that held earlier this year, that as a minor, Keira Bell lacked the capacity to consent to such treatment. Eventually, the issue will doubtless make its way to the UK's highest court.
So, my Twitter account has been removed without any warning. It was a very small account (under 200 followers & growing) mainly used to amplify news & info supporting the sex-based rights of women & girls & for stating the obvious! Apart from the sheer bloody cheek of it, my main thoughts are as to what this indicates. Does the removal of small & insignificant accounts such as mine mean that the purge has intensified because they feel emboldened, or is this because they know they are losing ground & see even the smallest of voices as a threat? (Apologies if this is the wrong thread)
So is a parent can know the true nature of their child, can we please start charging those parents as accessories or accomplices to crimes committed by their child who later on in life turns out to be a sadistic rapist, murderer, paedo etc
Oh God this is awful news.
Have you seen this, Graham? I know you wrote about Prinx Chiyo (the young woman trying to enter gay male spaces and to win Sexiest Gay England or something like that: https://sheridansinclair.substack.com/p/the-tragic-case-of-prinx-chiyo/comments
It’s worth reading because her case is absolutely tragic. She is doing this in order to have sex with men in a way she feels will be safe- as a man- after everything she’s been through. It’s extremely sad.
Sorry to derail the article, there’s no place on here to chat and trade resources!
thank you for this!
I am a nobody with a twitter and a blog account. Thanks to the editor of attitude magazine and the CEO of Mr Gay England wanting to take me down I have about 10,000 hits. I'm a nobody, why do they care so much? Are they scared? The best and easiest solution would have been to ignore me. But of course, no homosexual person must be allowed to assert their boundaries. It's absolutely chilling.
It's all properly coming out now. very happy to see you're a subscriber, Sheridan!
'The Outcome is unknown' is repeated as a phrase.. this is chilling
Tragic. From someone who knows medication and surgery is something that should only be done when absolutely necessary. Side effects and consequences are always there. Mumbo jumbo isn’t a valid reason for medication, intervention or surgery.
Thank you... I was sure I'd read before about some of the Tavistock whistleblowers saying they suspected some of the parents were abusive/paedophiles but couldn't find where.
From a US reader—what is the Times story, please? It’s paywalled. Thank you.
Never mind. Found the story. The Daily Mail: a UK court held that parents can consent to hormone treatment for their minor child. (Unremarkable, really, that parents may consent to medical treatment for their child—however, I’m guessing that the original Times story contained references to minors whose treatment was initiated by homophobic parents preferring a trans kid to a gay/lesbian kid. I'd still like to see the Times story.)
Interestingly, this decision was handed down by a single justice, who sat on the panel that held earlier this year, that as a minor, Keira Bell lacked the capacity to consent to such treatment. Eventually, the issue will doubtless make its way to the UK's highest court.
The legalising of the ‘grooming’ of children by their mentally unstable parents and quacks. What a great ‘moral’ victory for all concerned.
I’m far from a perfect parent, but I’m sure most would agree what a loving parent is
They seek to limit their child's consumption of sugary drinks and food
They would not let them gorge on these foods, knowing what harm it can do to their young bodies
They seek to explain the risks of drugs and alcohol to their child
They would not give them a diet including these toxic substances
They seek help for the anorexic teen and institutionalise as a last resort
They would not triumph in the slow starvation of their child
They seek to limit their access to gaming seeing the harm it is doing to their child’s mental health
They would not let them play games night and day
They seek to encourage that their child takes learning seriously
They would not willingly restrict their access to education
They seek help for their child who is self-harming
They would not ensure easy access to instruments of self-harm
They seek to remove their child from a toxic relationship with a peer or another adult
They would not encourage that friendship
They want to seek out un-biased, professional support for their child and allow them to wear what they want
They would not sanction the mutilation of their young bodies by themselves or others
They give over their lives to raise their child to be a strong and healthy adult
They would not throw them to the wolves to ensure their own self-gratification
So, my Twitter account has been removed without any warning. It was a very small account (under 200 followers & growing) mainly used to amplify news & info supporting the sex-based rights of women & girls & for stating the obvious! Apart from the sheer bloody cheek of it, my main thoughts are as to what this indicates. Does the removal of small & insignificant accounts such as mine mean that the purge has intensified because they feel emboldened, or is this because they know they are losing ground & see even the smallest of voices as a threat? (Apologies if this is the wrong thread)
So is a parent can know the true nature of their child, can we please start charging those parents as accessories or accomplices to crimes committed by their child who later on in life turns out to be a sadistic rapist, murderer, paedo etc