Are you SURE that’s enough words in your headline and subhead, Ben ‘Husband Was a Mermaids Trustee’ Cohen? Here’s the interview with Stephen Knight which they’ve wanked themselves into a tizz over.
Haven't had a chance to look at the video yet but FFS. Just FFS. I'm staying with a friend and my attempt to peak her was a total flop. She CANNOT separate LGB from the QT. It's all love and tolerance and acceptance. She even said the words "born into the wrong gender".She also said I'd got my information from the Daily Mail, to which I replied that I got my information "from the source", not the press. At which point she said the source "needed looked at" (as if I've been looking at "anti-trans propaganda"). By source, I actually meant the organisations perpetrating the harm, like Mermaids. They're doing all of this IN PLAIN SIGHT.
Thank you so much for this community Glinner. Otherwise I'd go stir crazy.
Any attempts to cheer me up would be appreciated. Do you think we're on the cusp of getting rid of this cult? Do you think the UK will wake up soon, more broadly? I can't take much more, the child abuse especially is unbearable.
Oh we're absolutely turning the tide. Buy your friend a subscription to the Times and make her look at all the fun scandals they've reported on lately: Mermaids and their safeguarding-free chat rooms is my current favourite. Another good tactic is to actually show her pictures of trans people, transwomen in particular. There's nothing like a leering bloke in a wig (in a women's prison for bonus points) to falter the 'be kind' narrative. These ally types don't actually look at the people themselves, they have a nice romanticised vision of a harmless pre-pubescent boy in a pink dress and are thinking, awww, bless, who would be mean to 'her'? Reality is a bit different.
I’m sorry Kay it sounds like your friend is totally and utterly brainwashed.
With women especially, the focus on predatory men is very effective, we’ve all experienced it. If the person admits that predatory men will do whatever is necessary to get access to vulnerable women and girls, it’s only a short step then to realising how easily the “inclusive” stuff can be taken advantage of. The fact about the proportion of TIMs being 4x higher (I think) in convicted sexual or violent criminals than in the general population is a thinker, too. There was a good tweet that said something to the effect of - either TIMs are more likely to commit these crimes, or they’re not “actually” trans and taking advantage of the system. Pick one.
If it helps though, I do believe the tide is turning! Tavistock shut down, Mermaids being investigated, multiple countries banning or issuing warnings on puberty blockers, Primark reversal on the changing rooms, huge increase in awareness, (some of) the media (Times, Telegraph, Daily Mail etc) openly covering these stories, celebs (Sharron Davies!) finally going against the tide, and politicians who’ll openly state what a woman is. That all together is huge! And would have been unthinkable a couple of years ago. So don’t lose hope.
This insidious movement affects us all, and the next time your friend is in a single sex changing room or toilets with a pervy man in the name of “inclusivity”, some cogs may start turning in her mind based on your conversation. So, thank you for trying.
I think it's a waste of time trying to turn the truly brainwashed. She'll come good in her own time. Or never.
Stay friends. Talk about cake, or whatever. Donate to the crowdfunders and discuss the issues with people who are less certain. Who've maybe had a brush with their employer's 'Equity Committee' and are feeling "Something's not right here".
Graham, God bless you in protecting children from mutilation, but if you support locking people up because they give child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual (about 1/3 of those who seek reparative therapy) the counselling and prayer they ask for, you've gone from walking with the angels to walking with paedophiles. "Fixated". David Paisley and 'Stephanie' Hayden would be proud of you. A refund on this month's payment would be appreciated. Cheers.
It contrasted the stance of LGBA Australia to a 'conversion therapy ban' with that of LGBA UK who are completely on board with LGBTQ in locking up people who give child sex abuse abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for.
In the final analysis Graham, you are an ally of paedophiles. You just draw the line at those paedophiles who want to see child mutilation to pave the way to abolition of the age of consent.
You seriously believe that if an 8 year old boy is sexually abused by several different men over a number of years that isn't going to disorientate they're sexuality? Perhaps you could explain why the number of homosexuals and lesbians sexually abused in childhood is way higher than heterosexuals? Over 40% for homosexuals, over 20% for lesbians according to the studies I've looked at.
One has to be a truly evil minded person to want to lock someone up for giving child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the prayer and counselling they ask for. Not at the deepest end of the moral cesspit like those who want to mutilate children, but certainly wading neck deep in it.
I have no doubt that the vast majority of Graham's subscribers would rather see children mutilated than Clause 28 brought back.
Clause 28 stopped the paedophile agenda in schools dead in its tracks.
Such illogical, contradictory, and homophobic drivel. Disorientating is not the same as changing, now is it? Your nonsense is full of holes. Go pray to your god, and stop cluttering up the comments.
This is the comment Graham deleted. I'm sure paedophile advocate Peter Tatchell would like to give him a big, fat LGBTQ hug for doing so:-
"I think the excess of transgender grooming in schools may be curbed but the intrinsically paedophile 'smashing heteronormativity' in schools will become even more entrenched.
So many GCs support the LGBTQ demand of locking up people who give child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for. That is paedophile evil in its purest form, but the LGB Alliance support that LGBTQ demand so 'allies' think it must be good. It isn't. Give your heads a wobble.
This ftom Hrllo magazine a couple of years ago....
Anthony was named in the list of the most powerful GPs in the UK by Pulse magazine and Benjamin made the Evening Standard's Progress 1000 list. But while this cool couple is changing the world - from fronting campaigns to giving LGBT+ teens and young people a voice and a place to call theirs in the media, when you meet them you realise they're also just a couple of loved up newly-weds, who can't wait to start a family.
I'd have serious concerns for any child being raised by these two.
'Start a family' is such a twee euphemism and we're to think no more or doubt how.
It's not quite so Hellolike but that should read 'start a family with external intervention from another human being with the gametes you require'. Stop this delusional picking and choosing reality! So biology and big or small gametes is useful to acknowledge when you choose. And there's no 'person who produces' those is there? They are irrelevant. To only use those of the opposite sex as a convenience to allow you to meet your needs is another element of this selective delusional thinking. Same as the disembodied 'cervix-havers' and 'people who bleed'. We're all just a generalised mass of flesh and organs and we got 'assigned' some things by accident or luck. No wonder organ theft and human trafficking to sustain the organ trade is booming.
Trying to fight the patriarchal oppressive heteronormative ‘system’ by replicating what they accuse it of being and using men or women of the opposite sex to do that is beyond hypocrisy. 2.4 children is replaced by 2.4 children but that's so radical.
My male friends at Uni were encouraged to donate sperm as they were paid and it was a nice little earner. It spread around in Fresher's week. We were chatting and we asked if we could do so too and make the most of things. They wouldn't sign us up. We were given a very stern talking to and about the reminders and differences in how our eggs could be harvested, and although generally very safe, it's being much more invasive and the risks to us and our fertility. It may have changed since, but it was yet another reminder of very basic biology and how fertility is a very different experience for women. Some of the young men thought this 'discomfort' was hilarious.
I was never sure about covid vaccines and “climate change” is a nuanced topic that requires nuanced inquiry. These pre-made statements designed to shame dissenters and free thinking, are tiresome.
Pink News can create their own reality on their own website and on twitter where awkward questions can be censored, but "No Debate With Hate" won't work on the Charity Commission when they investigate Mermaids. Nor will it apply in the courtroom when 1000 families bring their case against the Tavistock. Then we'll find out how a cult reacts when it's forced to engage with objective reality and I'm guessing it won't be with acceptance or rationality.
I haven’t had time to watch the video yet but there’s nothing wrong with not automatically believing what we are told by the hysterical media. We now know that Covid vaccines have an alarmingly high adverse event rate and don’t prevent transmission. I don’t know much about climate change but my experience of how media and politicians have behaved over gender nonsense and Covid authoritarianism does not inspire much confidence.
It's the worst form of fearmongering and ignorance spreading to get clicks. Being silenced for asking genuine questions is what has far-reaching consequences. I cannot believe Pink News are allowed to continue muck spreading like with Money pox. That doesn't help the NHS, GPs or national or local adverse symptom or event reporting systems. It destroyed faith in so much, then having experts pitted against politicians.
I was aware professionally early on but I was advised to go early to get my own first vaccine as I am clinically extremely vulnerable. I watched this unfold with my professional hat arguing with my member of the public hat. We were involved with the early rollout and advising on how to engage with cohorts and 'the general public'. I knew the problems but it still took me three attempts for my first one as I was turned away due to the contents or stocks of the different ones and there was apparently no system to record this or potential allergies/histories. I was told 'this can't be happening' and 'you're an outlier' when staff and I knew I wasn't. It was thankfully up to the brilliant local doctors, nurses and volunteers onsite to have robust conversations and get to a solution. We did. What shocked me was that they did not trust any NHS medical records, laughed that anyone would and relied on speaking to the patient in person, then triple-checking which is what all sane professionals do. We used the ancient system of checking stocks daily, phone calls and left handwritten notes instead. When I needed my second dose and was sent multiple digital reminders months later I struggled again as the 'system' was still not integrated properly, updating or recording our details accurately. I was told to ignore all generic 'NHS' communications to me (emails, text messages and app alerts). Very little was being picked up in the press about this but was a known issue and they were scared of raising problems. The Covid vaccination helpline were well aware and as frustrated as we were. They were being hammered by angry people and MPs. Different parts of 'the NHS' were raising it with other parts and what was badged as 'NHS'.
When I managed to find a pharmacy that could dispense the right one for a further dose, the very odd and bored nurse in a place I needed to travel to was very suspicious and refused to give me the vaccine as she accused me of 'picking and choosing' the 'better one', 'following the fashion' and 'being an anti-vaxxer'. A few phone calls, emails and stern letters later, and one paper letter I had to physically take with me as evidence (plus my NHS app and mobile record) and the local advice to clinicians was 'updated' and like magic I received it. I did have reactions, but was pre-warned, warned them and was ready for it, so it wasn't such an issue. I then reported that, and we all had to trust it was being fed back to the right systems.
[Edit: As Graham censors (deletes) my comments that oppose locking people up if they give child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for, I will be getting a refund on my monthly subscription. If you oppose mutilating children but support that, it means your an ally of the less extreme end of the paedophile movement. Less damned, but still damned. No doubt you'll be campaigning alongside Peter Tatchell on this Graham?]
This interview is like a book one can't put down.
As an ex left wing atheist who has now been a deeply conservative Christian for an aeon, everything Graham and Stephen believe in is entirely consistent with being a left wing liberal. Anyone who believes in democracy is 'liberal' with a small 'l'.
I despair at the number of times I see fellow conservatives refer to far left psychopaths as 'Liberal'. How politically illiterate can you be?
No matter how conservative one may be, or how left-liberal one may be, if we're genuine democrats there's far more that unites us than divides us.
It should be no surprise at all that on the issue of not mutilating children conservatives and genuine left-liberals are on the same page.
I would say though that what used to be 'the decent left' has revealed itself to be a posture. It's undergone a mass psychosis. Even a huge swathe of what calls itself 'the right' have undergone a mass psychosis as well. I think it's a mix of massive cowardice and psychosis that Parliament actually voted to make paedophile grooming compulsory in schools from kindergarden by 538-21 in 2019.
We're at war and Graham is a warrior on the right side of history.
I don't think it's any great discovery that the climate changes. That absurd 'discovery' was the fall back position to cover embarrassment when the climate wasn't playing ball over 'global warming'. Personally, after the UEA emails, I'm not willling to cover for politicians being such utter chumps for falling for charlatan Michael Mann's hockey stick nonsense. Covid is of course real. A think a safe rule of thumb is anyone who calls it a 'plandemic' is a malign nutjob.
That was actually a lovely interview, you are so honest and humble in it. I totally get you as well - if they’ll lie about what a woman is, they’ll lie about ANYTHING. Climate change, Covid, the lot. Went to a stats conference recently (cos I’m exciting like that) and one of the keynotes was about how there was poor use of data at the beginning of the pandemic and things were made to look worse than they were.
Usual ad hominem crap from pink perv news, always trying to muddy the waters.
Just because some of us are fighting back against the obscenity that is transgender bollocks, doesn't mean we all agree on everything else. I'm sure there are pro and anti Covid vaccers among us, just as there are people who agree or disagree on climate change. Some of us vote left, others right, some are religious and some are atheists. Right now, our views on other subjects are of no importance in this fight.
A heavy entrenchment in anti-trans activism has "far reaching consequences"? Interesting. Note how we're not talking about actual anti-vax sentiments but simply "being unsure" about the safety of covid vaccines. Hardly a confrontational attitude. But apparently "unscientific"? Since when was science about absolute certainty?
"UK looks to be winning the fight against monkeypox"
Phew! Thank God for that! .... though to be honest I wasn't aware there WAS a fight against monkeypox.
But note how one Josh Parry tells us that we're not completely out of the cliche, sorry, woods yet.
Josh is billed as "LGBT & Identity Producer" (Identity Producer? Does he specialise in relocation programmes for criminals?) But the LGBT link may be significant. After all, wasn't monkeypox a particular problem for "men who have sex with men"? And if we are talking about the gay community then we can segue effortlessly into transgender. And while we're there, segue equally effortlessly into the climate issue too!
Hell, while we're at it, why not toss in anti-Semitism!
All that 'article' reveals is Graham believes in science, and as we know, science is transphobic.
Haven't had a chance to look at the video yet but FFS. Just FFS. I'm staying with a friend and my attempt to peak her was a total flop. She CANNOT separate LGB from the QT. It's all love and tolerance and acceptance. She even said the words "born into the wrong gender".She also said I'd got my information from the Daily Mail, to which I replied that I got my information "from the source", not the press. At which point she said the source "needed looked at" (as if I've been looking at "anti-trans propaganda"). By source, I actually meant the organisations perpetrating the harm, like Mermaids. They're doing all of this IN PLAIN SIGHT.
Thank you so much for this community Glinner. Otherwise I'd go stir crazy.
Any attempts to cheer me up would be appreciated. Do you think we're on the cusp of getting rid of this cult? Do you think the UK will wake up soon, more broadly? I can't take much more, the child abuse especially is unbearable.
Have her watch the EDI Jester video that is a warning to gay men.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sAa5aJmfrA8
That is a brilliant video - sent it to 2 people. Favourite bit….
the word trans is like saying the word vegetable - which one are we talking about?
We do know however, that the majority of transwomen have an eggplant.
And a banana
And a 'banana split' does not change a man into a woman. 😄
That vegetable comment was brilliant!
Thank you KFP! :)
Haha, you'll find me on tour in Gender Critical YouTube channels! 😄
I see you a lot, I'm around quite a lot too! :D
👊
Oh we're absolutely turning the tide. Buy your friend a subscription to the Times and make her look at all the fun scandals they've reported on lately: Mermaids and their safeguarding-free chat rooms is my current favourite. Another good tactic is to actually show her pictures of trans people, transwomen in particular. There's nothing like a leering bloke in a wig (in a women's prison for bonus points) to falter the 'be kind' narrative. These ally types don't actually look at the people themselves, they have a nice romanticised vision of a harmless pre-pubescent boy in a pink dress and are thinking, awww, bless, who would be mean to 'her'? Reality is a bit different.
Thank you so much for this. I appreciate it :-)
I’m sorry Kay it sounds like your friend is totally and utterly brainwashed.
With women especially, the focus on predatory men is very effective, we’ve all experienced it. If the person admits that predatory men will do whatever is necessary to get access to vulnerable women and girls, it’s only a short step then to realising how easily the “inclusive” stuff can be taken advantage of. The fact about the proportion of TIMs being 4x higher (I think) in convicted sexual or violent criminals than in the general population is a thinker, too. There was a good tweet that said something to the effect of - either TIMs are more likely to commit these crimes, or they’re not “actually” trans and taking advantage of the system. Pick one.
If it helps though, I do believe the tide is turning! Tavistock shut down, Mermaids being investigated, multiple countries banning or issuing warnings on puberty blockers, Primark reversal on the changing rooms, huge increase in awareness, (some of) the media (Times, Telegraph, Daily Mail etc) openly covering these stories, celebs (Sharron Davies!) finally going against the tide, and politicians who’ll openly state what a woman is. That all together is huge! And would have been unthinkable a couple of years ago. So don’t lose hope.
This insidious movement affects us all, and the next time your friend is in a single sex changing room or toilets with a pervy man in the name of “inclusivity”, some cogs may start turning in her mind based on your conversation. So, thank you for trying.
Thank you so much! V. much appreciated :) you all cheered me up!
I think it's a waste of time trying to turn the truly brainwashed. She'll come good in her own time. Or never.
Stay friends. Talk about cake, or whatever. Donate to the crowdfunders and discuss the issues with people who are less certain. Who've maybe had a brush with their employer's 'Equity Committee' and are feeling "Something's not right here".
Lots of people have a comfort blanket over their brain. Makes thinking impossible
Thank you..you're right. No good pushing. I feel like it's such a cognitive barrier!
Yes your wish is granted - it is the beginning of it being over and lots of people will go to Jail
🧚♀️ 🪄
I sooo hope so!
That's conversion therapy, and you seem fixated on arguing for it.
have deleted for same reason as below
Graham, God bless you in protecting children from mutilation, but if you support locking people up because they give child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual (about 1/3 of those who seek reparative therapy) the counselling and prayer they ask for, you've gone from walking with the angels to walking with paedophiles. "Fixated". David Paisley and 'Stephanie' Hayden would be proud of you. A refund on this month's payment would be appreciated. Cheers.
I don't have time to look at this video but I don 't like the way you introduce it so I'd deleting to be safe.
Peter Tatchell would be proud of you.
It contrasted the stance of LGBA Australia to a 'conversion therapy ban' with that of LGBA UK who are completely on board with LGBTQ in locking up people who give child sex abuse abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for.
In the final analysis Graham, you are an ally of paedophiles. You just draw the line at those paedophiles who want to see child mutilation to pave the way to abolition of the age of consent.
Sexual orientation is innate and immutable whether it's homosexuality, bisexuality, or heterosexuality - what are you rambling on about?
You seriously believe that if an 8 year old boy is sexually abused by several different men over a number of years that isn't going to disorientate they're sexuality? Perhaps you could explain why the number of homosexuals and lesbians sexually abused in childhood is way higher than heterosexuals? Over 40% for homosexuals, over 20% for lesbians according to the studies I've looked at.
One has to be a truly evil minded person to want to lock someone up for giving child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the prayer and counselling they ask for. Not at the deepest end of the moral cesspit like those who want to mutilate children, but certainly wading neck deep in it.
I have no doubt that the vast majority of Graham's subscribers would rather see children mutilated than Clause 28 brought back.
Clause 28 stopped the paedophile agenda in schools dead in its tracks.
We are where we are today because of its repeal.
Such illogical, contradictory, and homophobic drivel. Disorientating is not the same as changing, now is it? Your nonsense is full of holes. Go pray to your god, and stop cluttering up the comments.
Sir, that is a wild and unsubstantiated comment. If prayer is working though, I'll have my Nan back please. Thanks !
'Unsubstantiated'?
This is the comment Graham deleted. I'm sure paedophile advocate Peter Tatchell would like to give him a big, fat LGBTQ hug for doing so:-
"I think the excess of transgender grooming in schools may be curbed but the intrinsically paedophile 'smashing heteronormativity' in schools will become even more entrenched.
So many GCs support the LGBTQ demand of locking up people who give child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for. That is paedophile evil in its purest form, but the LGB Alliance support that LGBTQ demand so 'allies' think it must be good. It isn't. Give your heads a wobble.
'EVIDENCE THAT DARE NOT SPEAK ITS NAME'
https://youtu.be/EZCJnDtPiIY "
It's official - Graham supports 'smash heteronormativity' in schools.
You need to use quotation marks correctly. Heteronormativity is an issue anyway. There's nothing inferior about being Homosexual or Bisexual.
At least trees aren't cut down to produce that digital rag - I see it has a dedicated 'trans' section but not lesbian, gay, or bisexual.
They'd rather not speak about the people they're stabbing in the back. Awful.
I see Ben's husband is proudly showing off an NHS trans flag badge on his Twitter.
This ftom Hrllo magazine a couple of years ago....
Anthony was named in the list of the most powerful GPs in the UK by Pulse magazine and Benjamin made the Evening Standard's Progress 1000 list. But while this cool couple is changing the world - from fronting campaigns to giving LGBT+ teens and young people a voice and a place to call theirs in the media, when you meet them you realise they're also just a couple of loved up newly-weds, who can't wait to start a family.
I'd have serious concerns for any child being raised by these two.
And funnily enough, they won’t be asking Alex Drummond to be their surrogate, or asking Owen Jones to donate an egg 🤔
MrMenno got kicked off Twitter for a similar comment. 😄
But surely you're not telling me that some kohl, a swishy skirt and head-tilt don't make babies? Tell me it isn't so!
'Start a family' is such a twee euphemism and we're to think no more or doubt how.
It's not quite so Hellolike but that should read 'start a family with external intervention from another human being with the gametes you require'. Stop this delusional picking and choosing reality! So biology and big or small gametes is useful to acknowledge when you choose. And there's no 'person who produces' those is there? They are irrelevant. To only use those of the opposite sex as a convenience to allow you to meet your needs is another element of this selective delusional thinking. Same as the disembodied 'cervix-havers' and 'people who bleed'. We're all just a generalised mass of flesh and organs and we got 'assigned' some things by accident or luck. No wonder organ theft and human trafficking to sustain the organ trade is booming.
Trying to fight the patriarchal oppressive heteronormative ‘system’ by replicating what they accuse it of being and using men or women of the opposite sex to do that is beyond hypocrisy. 2.4 children is replaced by 2.4 children but that's so radical.
My male friends at Uni were encouraged to donate sperm as they were paid and it was a nice little earner. It spread around in Fresher's week. We were chatting and we asked if we could do so too and make the most of things. They wouldn't sign us up. We were given a very stern talking to and about the reminders and differences in how our eggs could be harvested, and although generally very safe, it's being much more invasive and the risks to us and our fertility. It may have changed since, but it was yet another reminder of very basic biology and how fertility is a very different experience for women. Some of the young men thought this 'discomfort' was hilarious.
He's the NHS'S LGBTQ lead guy at The Royal College of GPs
I hadn't seen an NHS trans only badge before - why not NHS crucifixes then?
Wanked themselves into a tizz over - I’ve had 3 kids - don’t make me piss myself 😂
At risk of a wizz because of the tizz.
🤣
They want to extend #NoDebate to EVERYTHING!
I was never sure about covid vaccines and “climate change” is a nuanced topic that requires nuanced inquiry. These pre-made statements designed to shame dissenters and free thinking, are tiresome.
C'mon Pink 'News' -- all the 'news' that's unfit to print. Reeks of desperation -- I find it heartening.
yeah, exactly. I knew this would be the line they'd take.
Or - 'this would be the lyin they'd take' 😁
Pink News can create their own reality on their own website and on twitter where awkward questions can be censored, but "No Debate With Hate" won't work on the Charity Commission when they investigate Mermaids. Nor will it apply in the courtroom when 1000 families bring their case against the Tavistock. Then we'll find out how a cult reacts when it's forced to engage with objective reality and I'm guessing it won't be with acceptance or rationality.
We know how a cult reacts - 'I'm not an expert'.
I haven’t had time to watch the video yet but there’s nothing wrong with not automatically believing what we are told by the hysterical media. We now know that Covid vaccines have an alarmingly high adverse event rate and don’t prevent transmission. I don’t know much about climate change but my experience of how media and politicians have behaved over gender nonsense and Covid authoritarianism does not inspire much confidence.
It's the worst form of fearmongering and ignorance spreading to get clicks. Being silenced for asking genuine questions is what has far-reaching consequences. I cannot believe Pink News are allowed to continue muck spreading like with Money pox. That doesn't help the NHS, GPs or national or local adverse symptom or event reporting systems. It destroyed faith in so much, then having experts pitted against politicians.
I was aware professionally early on but I was advised to go early to get my own first vaccine as I am clinically extremely vulnerable. I watched this unfold with my professional hat arguing with my member of the public hat. We were involved with the early rollout and advising on how to engage with cohorts and 'the general public'. I knew the problems but it still took me three attempts for my first one as I was turned away due to the contents or stocks of the different ones and there was apparently no system to record this or potential allergies/histories. I was told 'this can't be happening' and 'you're an outlier' when staff and I knew I wasn't. It was thankfully up to the brilliant local doctors, nurses and volunteers onsite to have robust conversations and get to a solution. We did. What shocked me was that they did not trust any NHS medical records, laughed that anyone would and relied on speaking to the patient in person, then triple-checking which is what all sane professionals do. We used the ancient system of checking stocks daily, phone calls and left handwritten notes instead. When I needed my second dose and was sent multiple digital reminders months later I struggled again as the 'system' was still not integrated properly, updating or recording our details accurately. I was told to ignore all generic 'NHS' communications to me (emails, text messages and app alerts). Very little was being picked up in the press about this but was a known issue and they were scared of raising problems. The Covid vaccination helpline were well aware and as frustrated as we were. They were being hammered by angry people and MPs. Different parts of 'the NHS' were raising it with other parts and what was badged as 'NHS'.
When I managed to find a pharmacy that could dispense the right one for a further dose, the very odd and bored nurse in a place I needed to travel to was very suspicious and refused to give me the vaccine as she accused me of 'picking and choosing' the 'better one', 'following the fashion' and 'being an anti-vaxxer'. A few phone calls, emails and stern letters later, and one paper letter I had to physically take with me as evidence (plus my NHS app and mobile record) and the local advice to clinicians was 'updated' and like magic I received it. I did have reactions, but was pre-warned, warned them and was ready for it, so it wasn't such an issue. I then reported that, and we all had to trust it was being fed back to the right systems.
[Edit: As Graham censors (deletes) my comments that oppose locking people up if they give child sex abuse victims who don't want to be homosexual the counselling and prayer they ask for, I will be getting a refund on my monthly subscription. If you oppose mutilating children but support that, it means your an ally of the less extreme end of the paedophile movement. Less damned, but still damned. No doubt you'll be campaigning alongside Peter Tatchell on this Graham?]
This interview is like a book one can't put down.
As an ex left wing atheist who has now been a deeply conservative Christian for an aeon, everything Graham and Stephen believe in is entirely consistent with being a left wing liberal. Anyone who believes in democracy is 'liberal' with a small 'l'.
I despair at the number of times I see fellow conservatives refer to far left psychopaths as 'Liberal'. How politically illiterate can you be?
No matter how conservative one may be, or how left-liberal one may be, if we're genuine democrats there's far more that unites us than divides us.
It should be no surprise at all that on the issue of not mutilating children conservatives and genuine left-liberals are on the same page.
I would say though that what used to be 'the decent left' has revealed itself to be a posture. It's undergone a mass psychosis. Even a huge swathe of what calls itself 'the right' have undergone a mass psychosis as well. I think it's a mix of massive cowardice and psychosis that Parliament actually voted to make paedophile grooming compulsory in schools from kindergarden by 538-21 in 2019.
We're at war and Graham is a warrior on the right side of history.
Covid and climate change are very real...but who has the answer/knowledge to fix it!!!
I don't think it's any great discovery that the climate changes. That absurd 'discovery' was the fall back position to cover embarrassment when the climate wasn't playing ball over 'global warming'. Personally, after the UEA emails, I'm not willling to cover for politicians being such utter chumps for falling for charlatan Michael Mann's hockey stick nonsense. Covid is of course real. A think a safe rule of thumb is anyone who calls it a 'plandemic' is a malign nutjob.
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
That was actually a lovely interview, you are so honest and humble in it. I totally get you as well - if they’ll lie about what a woman is, they’ll lie about ANYTHING. Climate change, Covid, the lot. Went to a stats conference recently (cos I’m exciting like that) and one of the keynotes was about how there was poor use of data at the beginning of the pandemic and things were made to look worse than they were.
Usual ad hominem crap from pink perv news, always trying to muddy the waters.
Just because some of us are fighting back against the obscenity that is transgender bollocks, doesn't mean we all agree on everything else. I'm sure there are pro and anti Covid vaccers among us, just as there are people who agree or disagree on climate change. Some of us vote left, others right, some are religious and some are atheists. Right now, our views on other subjects are of no importance in this fight.
They are so pressed. Thumbs up.
A heavy entrenchment in anti-trans activism has "far reaching consequences"? Interesting. Note how we're not talking about actual anti-vax sentiments but simply "being unsure" about the safety of covid vaccines. Hardly a confrontational attitude. But apparently "unscientific"? Since when was science about absolute certainty?
Perhaps the answer lies here:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-63072281
"UK looks to be winning the fight against monkeypox"
Phew! Thank God for that! .... though to be honest I wasn't aware there WAS a fight against monkeypox.
But note how one Josh Parry tells us that we're not completely out of the cliche, sorry, woods yet.
Josh is billed as "LGBT & Identity Producer" (Identity Producer? Does he specialise in relocation programmes for criminals?) But the LGBT link may be significant. After all, wasn't monkeypox a particular problem for "men who have sex with men"? And if we are talking about the gay community then we can segue effortlessly into transgender. And while we're there, segue equally effortlessly into the climate issue too!
Hell, while we're at it, why not toss in anti-Semitism!