The spooky goings on at Pink News: why is their Twitter feed a graveyard?
I have a TERRRIFYING theory
All right, this is very spooky. Pink News has 271 thousand followers on Twitter—a quarter of a million souls—yet their engagement is so low it almost counts as anti-engagement.
A few examples taken at random. Numbers are true as of time of writing.
Number 1 - no one interested in Pink News take on fetishist performer getting his cock out
This is a Saturday night. Engagement should be somewhat healthy on a Saturday night, surely?
1 reply, 2 retweets, 17 likes, no quote tweets.
Number 2 - (Saturday 5 hours ago) - no one is interested in the Pink News view on Florida banning chemical castration of gay youth
6 replies, 8 retweets, 16 Likes, 2 QTs.
Number 3 - No one is interested in another JK Rowling hit piece
9 replies, 5 retweets, 23 likes, 5 QTs
Number 4 - No one is interested in the Pink News take on Scotland fucking over women
The lack of engagement here is extraordinary.
0 Replies , 7 retweets, 38 likes, 1 QT
Number 5 – The pièce de résistance – Pink News supports Jeremy Corbyn attacking Kemi Badenoch – no one cares
0 replies (ZERO!!!!), 3 retweets, 23 likes, 0 quote tweets
So what is going on here?
I have a theory.
I think there are, at most, 38 people reading Pink News…
….and the other 26,962 followers are …
…Guh…Guh…GHOSTS!
No, but seriously, why is engagement so low? Does anyone have any thoughts?
“I never supported it” has started
Hi Graham, I just subbed and wanted to thank you for putting yourself on the line for the cause! I support you 100%