Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fraserreal's avatar

You know, I’ve been thinking about this. Part of the reason for such flagrant disregard of women’s breasts, and why they’re so easily dismissed, even removed -- is the utter lack of respect for their complexity and function. They are irreplaceable. Complex. Milk producing. Miracles of function and beauty. Yet for decades they’ve been called ‘boobs’ and ‘tits’. They are breasts. I refuse to use the word 'boobs' or 'tits', and notice that even the most dedicated feminists use these descriptors, not realizing the unconscious damage the words contain.

For decades, plastic surgeons have put harmful implants into them to please the male gaze. Everywhere we look, breasts have been pornographically reduced to playthings. And women have fallen for the societal degradation of their breasts, and have joined in that degradation -- constantly seeking cosmetic breast surgeries.

Breasts are not allowed to be on ‘public display’ if they are fulfilling their prime purpose — feeding a baby. God forbid. No wonder young girls have little regard for their breasts, if not downright fear of them and the attention they attract. And now we have TRA’s jiggling and fondling their own hormonally induced ‘moobs’ -- this travesty against nature will only further contribute to young girls’ hatred of their own bodies.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Look at her eyes, she’s a psychopath. And the photos of her in her clingy dresses revelling in her womanhood whilst removing young women’s womanhood. Psychopath.

Expand full comment
56 more comments...

No posts