The Guardian and its 'both sides' lie

Alan Henness Esq. @zeno001

Why did @guardian choose not to mention that the departing Chair of the @EHRC was Chair of the trans lobby group @stonewalluk for nine years? 'Polarised' debate on gender recognition is harming UK, says equalities chief | Transgender | The Guardian

theguardian.com‘Polarised’ debate on gender recognition is harming UK, says equalities chiefDavid Isaac urges women’s groups and transgender campaigners to listen to each other and focus on consensus

I know, Sir! It’s because the Guardian has a financial interest in mischaracterizing this debate to its readers. This is not a ‘both-sides-are-bad’ situation. This is a situation where feminists who centre women in their feminism (actual feminists, in other words) are vilified, smeared, bombarded with rape and death threats and even physically assaulted.

It’s 2020 and women can’t even hold a meeting without woke arseholes trying to disrupt it. Look what this young Muslim woman had to deal with. Those are Labour conference attendees banging on the doors and windows.

As for The Guardian, not only do they have to think about the miracle of their young woke Anglophile American audience, but they also have Anthony Salz, who has links with Mermaids, sitting on a board that has the power to fire the editor.

So when you’re wondering why the Guardian conveniently forgets a fact like the one Alan mentions in the tweet above, just remember that advice that will never grow old, that will always remain true.

Follow the money.