King's College London has disgraced itself by platforming Yasmin Benoit's boobs. "Asexual activist" indeed. What a travesty of academia. Oh, well - she personifies everything that's wrong with iden-titty politics.
As someone with a biology degree, I'm always tickled by these identity nitwits pinching biological terms and applying them to themselves. Asexual organisms reproduce without sex and include yeast or fungi such as slime moulds. Maybe Yasmin should look for another term for herself? Or maybe identifying as a mould fits the bill?
Like people who point out a person’s actual biological sex are portrayed as ‘denying their humanity’? It’s actually an affirmation of someone’s humanity to deny their cross sex identity, since human’s are incapable of changing sex. Otherwise, we would be denying their humanity, while affirming their, possibly, amphibian identity?
To be perfectly fair, the first several Girls I ever met who loved raves/festivals—and who absolutely alws danced the day away in ABSURDLY skimpy rave outfits—were dutifully practicing Mormons, with exactly zero intention of rebellious sexual acting-out. That was just their vibe ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.... so as far as I'm concerned, Yasmin Benoit is just another young Woman who's normal, but has imbibed some really fucking weird ideas about sexuality (or—more likely—pretends to have imbibed those views, and makes a damn good living for Her age from that acting gig).
In response to everybody's next question: Yes, the Mormon Girls in "slutty" outfits all partied completely clean and sober.
The man who wrote such a glowing appraisal of a child rapist/ murderer in Newsweek, of all places, ought to have caused the whole magazine to be defunded. Happily the comments all pointed out what an absolute travesty of human decorum the whole thing represented, with many of them saying that their other comments had been deleted, so one imagines there was worse that never made the light of day. Absolutely disgusting. In a just world that "journalist" would never work again.
Welcome Nutmeg, you’re off to a great start as we all knew you would be but it’s enraging that a ‘great start’ means more of larping men being utterly obnoxious as ever.
She does like to put her goods in the shop window, doesn't she? And then rattles on about how the shop is closed for business. Perhaps we need a new word for this sort of display. I feel unsuited to inventing it.
Does male actor Gascón deserve any film accolades? Best Impersonator, maybe?
Being very ancient, I can remember when women cinema & stage players insisted they were "actors" and that to be called "actresses" was patronising and demeaning: "obsolete terms that date from a time when professions were largely the preserve of one sex, usually men". (From the Guardian & Observer style guide 2011).
However, I see that The Guardian has rescinded its own guidance, in order to describe this man, Karla Sofía Gascón as an "actress" (The rise and fall of Emilia Pérez, 5th Feb).
Poor journos, forever having to learn and update NewSpeak!
I am enjoying the post Trump Gender Woo meltdowns.
Amazing the amount of DIE money!!!! Getting rid of DIE is going to have such a significant effect!
I am getting confused about Asexual as a gender. If someone chats you up are they guilty of transphobia? Anyway I am greatly looking forward to Benoit's first academic paper ( I think it might be quite short..and hardly racy!!) and I was also interested to note how you are meant to dress if you are an Asexual.
Gobsmacking that Maya had to give evidence about male violence against women.
Obviously the correct answer to 'you're not a biologist' is...altogether now...
"I'm not a vet but I know what a dog is".
Best of luck Sandie Peggie.
Small point - I think she is also taking a direct sex discrimination claim ( this was added in later in the day).
For Terven reference purposes I have gathered all the beautiful Executive Orders in one place:
Will cross post in due course( and then I'm sure I won't need to do that again because all my readers will be avidly following you if they are not already).
It's social engineering. Actually, it's multiple different acts of social engineering at once—all of them dystopian, most of them genuinely horrifying.
I just fat-fingered ctrl+W (close tab) instead of ctrl+V (paste) on a LONG response to this post with at least 20 different links. POOF at least 90 minutes of typing, vaporized... and even if I had the heart to re-type it all out from scratch (which I don't), I don't have the time. Blaaaaaaaaahh
But here's 3 current applications of "asexuality as an identity", just for a taste of how gut-wrenchingly dystopian, misogynistic and homophobic "institutional LGBTQ+" has become. We've left Orwell behind and we're riding with Camus now, folks.
.
1/
The trans lobby has known for at least 15 years that "trans kids" are not only being sterilized, but will also end up anorgasmic (completely incapable of orgasm) and more generally with EVERYTHING about their sexuality—both cognitive and physiological—perpetually frozen in pre-pubescence.
The oligarchs leading the TRA movement COULD choose actual courage at this point: they COULD dismantle their own special little Unit 731 that they've custom-built for troubled kids with a 3/4ths chance of having autism and a 5/6ths chance of growing up to be gay adults, and come clean—maybe even kickstarting a Truth & Reconciliation Commission of sorts, which, if they took the initiative to do now, they would almost certainly not face sentences themselves.
Buuuuut that would take actual courage. And also—infinitely more horrifying [§]—if they did that, then they'd probably end up losing their wealth to detransitioner lawsuits, and they might even have to get a J-O-B someday. GASP! quelle horreur ma soeur! Nah.
So instead they've built ANOTHER delulu world, for the "trans kids" who finally give up on being "trans"—or who are forced out of it, when they're 27 years old, eleven years post-menopausal, with advanced osteoporosis, unable to eat without dentures or a blender, and they lose their health insurance (or the insurer hits a $1M or $2M lifetime out-of-pocket max and says sorry pal, we're done here).
That would be the "asexual advocacy" world, where they get lovebombed into believing that they're actually "asexual"... INHERENTLY. Not because they're VICTIMS who were literally butchered and neutered as fucking CHILDREN or anything. Shhhhhh! Tell them they're "ace" enough times and they might just die [§§] without suing anybody!
.
2/
ORGASMS ARE FOR BOYS:
just in case you still think "asexual" means celibate... that's way too wholesome, and not nearly cynical enough.
"Asexuality as part of institutional LGBTQ+" is the opposite—actively pushing the idea that "asexual people" might still want, and/or have, sexual relationships. (Yes, that's "and/or".. No, these people don't believe that "have sex" should alws be paired with "want sex"... well, not for Girls or Women at least.)
The usual wording you'll see on NGO websites is:
"Asexual people may still have sexual relationships for a variety of reasons. [...] For instance, they may have sex to please a partner."
Good god on a fucking half shell. Where I come from, that's called rape culture.
You'll be entirely unsurprised to learn that the PARTNER of the "asexual" in these relationships—the one who just GETS pleasured, with no expectation whatsoever of GIVING satisfaction—is male in 100% of the cases ever profiled by these organizations, and female in the remaining 0% of cases. Because orgasms are for boys, right? Pleasure is for boys.
How progressive.
.
3/
PORN ADDICTION AS A TYPE OF "ASEXUALITY"
look, I just fucking can't with this shit, so i'll just copypaste from this FAQ on the site of an entire NGO specifically for "asexuals":
>> My partner masturbates and/or watches pornography, but doesn't want to have sex with me. How is this possible?
>> Some asexual people can still experience arousal and have a libido that requires some stimulation to satisfy while also not desiring sex with other people. Some asexual people feel the need to masturbate for a sense of physical release, while also not having any sense of sexual attraction or desire for having sex with another person. It’s not necessarily about masturbation or pornography being preferred over partnered sex to meet the same needs – it’s that the needs are different due to the person having a different sexual orientation.
Yeeaaaaaaahhhh. Uhhuh. Sure guys. It's not like porn creates dead bedrooms, or like there's an endemic problem of 20-something guys with erectile dysfunction because of all that death-grip masturbation for hours on end, or anything. Naaaahhh. Porn is a VALID SEXUALITY.
More "FAQ" here—none of it good or pro-social, other than a few lines of lip service about "consent" that are undermined by almost everything else written on the page... read it yourselves. https://www.asexuality.org/?q=relationship.html#fs4
"Infinitely more horrifying" is perfectly literal here BTW. EVERY founder of modern transgenderism, except one, has inherited a family fortune of 9 or more figures—the very richest being the Pritzkers, heirs to the Hyatt Hotel multi billions (13 of them, all billionaires) and Jon an "Susan" Stryker of the Stryker Medical Devices family (hmmm medical devices you say! Surely a coincidence that they're pushing surgeries and other lifelong medical dependencies...).
Like at least 99.9 percent of other inheritors of enough money to absolutely guarantee lavish financial security, they're all horrible people who will leave the world worse than they found it in numerous ways. None of them could possibly fathom the possibility of actually having to work for a living, which they would probably unironically experience as a living hell if they suddenly had to start going to work in the morning themselves.
The one TRA founder who actually worked for his money, Martin"e" Rothblatt, is fucked up in a whole different set of ways, which are all off topic here.
[§§]
Hey Canadians! Y'know that whole MAID / assisted-suicide thing, that's now 7% of all deaths in your country? Did you know that the Trudeau government spent 3 YEARS drawing up plans for "MAID for mature minors" as young as TWELVE, before finally shelving it after a bunch of badly underfunded youth-disability-advocacy groups banded together to raise outrage?
Yuup. They were planning to make assisted suicide happen, for KIDS. as young as TWELVE.
Bet you can't guess which artificially-created demographic group they had in mind when they picked 12 as the cutoff!
Who cares if a rapist and murderer suffers from gender dysphoria? Has the world gone mad? The Newsweek article author must be completely insensitive to detail the horrific crimes this man perpetrated, while giving compassion vibes to his gender dysphoria and bra style preferences? You could not pay many people to put this drivel in print. Luckily, at least, Connecticut gave him no possibility of parole? In Australia the TIM that attacked people with an axe to their heads is already out??
Heartening to see further confirmation that BBC Scotland is not only biased against the very idea of Scottish independence but is blatantly biased towards the mad and immensely disruptive beliefs and behaviours of the Uptons of this country (as the SNP will be, of course, while no one should believe that today's SNP gives a damn about independence, though the BBC will perpetuate that fallacy forever) and against critics who have already been proven correct like Maya Forstater. Heartening because this is another nail in the state broadcaster's coffin. In any case, Upton yours, BBC.
Off to a flying start Nutmeg, thank you. Having been unable to tune into the Sandie Peggie tribune this week but seeing it all over X, I particularly appreciated your summary and await the comments for this next (inevitable) case win.
Hey Nutmeg. Thanks for picking up the baton passed by JL. It cannot be fun trawling through this utter nonsense, sometimes it's utterly depraved. How can anyone be sympathetic for a child rapist that knowingly set his victim on fire. I just do not get it.
King's College London has disgraced itself by platforming Yasmin Benoit's boobs. "Asexual activist" indeed. What a travesty of academia. Oh, well - she personifies everything that's wrong with iden-titty politics.
As someone with a biology degree, I'm always tickled by these identity nitwits pinching biological terms and applying them to themselves. Asexual organisms reproduce without sex and include yeast or fungi such as slime moulds. Maybe Yasmin should look for another term for herself? Or maybe identifying as a mould fits the bill?
Like people who point out a person’s actual biological sex are portrayed as ‘denying their humanity’? It’s actually an affirmation of someone’s humanity to deny their cross sex identity, since human’s are incapable of changing sex. Otherwise, we would be denying their humanity, while affirming their, possibly, amphibian identity?
I’ve said before her asexual assets are displayed with a huge amount of pride 🙄
Honestly that outfit did not scream 'asexual' to me. What an absolute degredation of academia.
It is embarrassing. I've come to accept that our state is determined to run this place into the ground. I've disconnected myself from it now.
To be perfectly fair, the first several Girls I ever met who loved raves/festivals—and who absolutely alws danced the day away in ABSURDLY skimpy rave outfits—were dutifully practicing Mormons, with exactly zero intention of rebellious sexual acting-out. That was just their vibe ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.... so as far as I'm concerned, Yasmin Benoit is just another young Woman who's normal, but has imbibed some really fucking weird ideas about sexuality (or—more likely—pretends to have imbibed those views, and makes a damn good living for Her age from that acting gig).
In response to everybody's next question: Yes, the Mormon Girls in "slutty" outfits all partied completely clean and sober.
Great start Nutmeg!! Welcome xx
What lily-livered cowards the BBC are not to report the indomitable Maya Forstater’s evidence. You go, girl.
The man who wrote such a glowing appraisal of a child rapist/ murderer in Newsweek, of all places, ought to have caused the whole magazine to be defunded. Happily the comments all pointed out what an absolute travesty of human decorum the whole thing represented, with many of them saying that their other comments had been deleted, so one imagines there was worse that never made the light of day. Absolutely disgusting. In a just world that "journalist" would never work again.
The trail may lead to USAID. That would make some "sense" of it.
Welcome Nutmeg, you’re off to a great start as we all knew you would be but it’s enraging that a ‘great start’ means more of larping men being utterly obnoxious as ever.
Agreed - Nutmeg, we're all so pleased you're stepping into JL's shoes and continuing her brilliant (but depressing) work. Thank you to you both ❤️
It will end. 🍀
Why does that assxual lassie always dress like a hooker?
She does like to put her goods in the shop window, doesn't she? And then rattles on about how the shop is closed for business. Perhaps we need a new word for this sort of display. I feel unsuited to inventing it.
‘Reporting Scotland ‘ are pathetic , Upton went in with a posse , vile man
Apologies welcome nutmeg 🙂
Does male actor Gascón deserve any film accolades? Best Impersonator, maybe?
Being very ancient, I can remember when women cinema & stage players insisted they were "actors" and that to be called "actresses" was patronising and demeaning: "obsolete terms that date from a time when professions were largely the preserve of one sex, usually men". (From the Guardian & Observer style guide 2011).
However, I see that The Guardian has rescinded its own guidance, in order to describe this man, Karla Sofía Gascón as an "actress" (The rise and fall of Emilia Pérez, 5th Feb).
Poor journos, forever having to learn and update NewSpeak!
hahha great point😆
The only people entitled to be called "actresses", it seems, are of course transwomen.
Brilliant start, Nutmeg. Will share on X
Great first post, Nutmeg😁
I am enjoying the post Trump Gender Woo meltdowns.
Amazing the amount of DIE money!!!! Getting rid of DIE is going to have such a significant effect!
I am getting confused about Asexual as a gender. If someone chats you up are they guilty of transphobia? Anyway I am greatly looking forward to Benoit's first academic paper ( I think it might be quite short..and hardly racy!!) and I was also interested to note how you are meant to dress if you are an Asexual.
Gobsmacking that Maya had to give evidence about male violence against women.
Obviously the correct answer to 'you're not a biologist' is...altogether now...
"I'm not a vet but I know what a dog is".
Best of luck Sandie Peggie.
Small point - I think she is also taking a direct sex discrimination claim ( this was added in later in the day).
For Terven reference purposes I have gathered all the beautiful Executive Orders in one place:
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/a-manifesto
Will cross post in due course( and then I'm sure I won't need to do that again because all my readers will be avidly following you if they are not already).
Dusty
>> I am getting confused on asexual as a gender
It's social engineering. Actually, it's multiple different acts of social engineering at once—all of them dystopian, most of them genuinely horrifying.
I just fat-fingered ctrl+W (close tab) instead of ctrl+V (paste) on a LONG response to this post with at least 20 different links. POOF at least 90 minutes of typing, vaporized... and even if I had the heart to re-type it all out from scratch (which I don't), I don't have the time. Blaaaaaaaaahh
But here's 3 current applications of "asexuality as an identity", just for a taste of how gut-wrenchingly dystopian, misogynistic and homophobic "institutional LGBTQ+" has become. We've left Orwell behind and we're riding with Camus now, folks.
.
1/
The trans lobby has known for at least 15 years that "trans kids" are not only being sterilized, but will also end up anorgasmic (completely incapable of orgasm) and more generally with EVERYTHING about their sexuality—both cognitive and physiological—perpetually frozen in pre-pubescence.
The oligarchs leading the TRA movement COULD choose actual courage at this point: they COULD dismantle their own special little Unit 731 that they've custom-built for troubled kids with a 3/4ths chance of having autism and a 5/6ths chance of growing up to be gay adults, and come clean—maybe even kickstarting a Truth & Reconciliation Commission of sorts, which, if they took the initiative to do now, they would almost certainly not face sentences themselves.
Buuuuut that would take actual courage. And also—infinitely more horrifying [§]—if they did that, then they'd probably end up losing their wealth to detransitioner lawsuits, and they might even have to get a J-O-B someday. GASP! quelle horreur ma soeur! Nah.
So instead they've built ANOTHER delulu world, for the "trans kids" who finally give up on being "trans"—or who are forced out of it, when they're 27 years old, eleven years post-menopausal, with advanced osteoporosis, unable to eat without dentures or a blender, and they lose their health insurance (or the insurer hits a $1M or $2M lifetime out-of-pocket max and says sorry pal, we're done here).
That would be the "asexual advocacy" world, where they get lovebombed into believing that they're actually "asexual"... INHERENTLY. Not because they're VICTIMS who were literally butchered and neutered as fucking CHILDREN or anything. Shhhhhh! Tell them they're "ace" enough times and they might just die [§§] without suing anybody!
.
2/
ORGASMS ARE FOR BOYS:
just in case you still think "asexual" means celibate... that's way too wholesome, and not nearly cynical enough.
"Asexuality as part of institutional LGBTQ+" is the opposite—actively pushing the idea that "asexual people" might still want, and/or have, sexual relationships. (Yes, that's "and/or".. No, these people don't believe that "have sex" should alws be paired with "want sex"... well, not for Girls or Women at least.)
The usual wording you'll see on NGO websites is:
"Asexual people may still have sexual relationships for a variety of reasons. [...] For instance, they may have sex to please a partner."
Good god on a fucking half shell. Where I come from, that's called rape culture.
You'll be entirely unsurprised to learn that the PARTNER of the "asexual" in these relationships—the one who just GETS pleasured, with no expectation whatsoever of GIVING satisfaction—is male in 100% of the cases ever profiled by these organizations, and female in the remaining 0% of cases. Because orgasms are for boys, right? Pleasure is for boys.
How progressive.
.
3/
PORN ADDICTION AS A TYPE OF "ASEXUALITY"
look, I just fucking can't with this shit, so i'll just copypaste from this FAQ on the site of an entire NGO specifically for "asexuals":
>> My partner masturbates and/or watches pornography, but doesn't want to have sex with me. How is this possible?
>> Some asexual people can still experience arousal and have a libido that requires some stimulation to satisfy while also not desiring sex with other people. Some asexual people feel the need to masturbate for a sense of physical release, while also not having any sense of sexual attraction or desire for having sex with another person. It’s not necessarily about masturbation or pornography being preferred over partnered sex to meet the same needs – it’s that the needs are different due to the person having a different sexual orientation.
Yeeaaaaaaahhhh. Uhhuh. Sure guys. It's not like porn creates dead bedrooms, or like there's an endemic problem of 20-something guys with erectile dysfunction because of all that death-grip masturbation for hours on end, or anything. Naaaahhh. Porn is a VALID SEXUALITY.
More "FAQ" here—none of it good or pro-social, other than a few lines of lip service about "consent" that are undermined by almost everything else written on the page... read it yourselves. https://www.asexuality.org/?q=relationship.html#fs4
Asexuality dot fucking org.
I hate this timeline.
.
ɪ'ᴍ ᴀʟᴇᴡɪғᴇʏ [ᴡɪғᴇʏ ғᴏʀ sʜᴏʀᴛ] ᴀɴᴅ I ᴡʀɪᴛᴇ ғᴏᴏᴛɴᴏᴛᴇs ᴏɴ ʙʟᴏɢ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴇɴᴛs, ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴀ ɴᴏʀᴍᴀʟ ᴘᴇʀsᴏɴ
[§]
"Infinitely more horrifying" is perfectly literal here BTW. EVERY founder of modern transgenderism, except one, has inherited a family fortune of 9 or more figures—the very richest being the Pritzkers, heirs to the Hyatt Hotel multi billions (13 of them, all billionaires) and Jon an "Susan" Stryker of the Stryker Medical Devices family (hmmm medical devices you say! Surely a coincidence that they're pushing surgeries and other lifelong medical dependencies...).
Like at least 99.9 percent of other inheritors of enough money to absolutely guarantee lavish financial security, they're all horrible people who will leave the world worse than they found it in numerous ways. None of them could possibly fathom the possibility of actually having to work for a living, which they would probably unironically experience as a living hell if they suddenly had to start going to work in the morning themselves.
The one TRA founder who actually worked for his money, Martin"e" Rothblatt, is fucked up in a whole different set of ways, which are all off topic here.
[§§]
Hey Canadians! Y'know that whole MAID / assisted-suicide thing, that's now 7% of all deaths in your country? Did you know that the Trudeau government spent 3 YEARS drawing up plans for "MAID for mature minors" as young as TWELVE, before finally shelving it after a bunch of badly underfunded youth-disability-advocacy groups banded together to raise outrage?
Yuup. They were planning to make assisted suicide happen, for KIDS. as young as TWELVE.
Bet you can't guess which artificially-created demographic group they had in mind when they picked 12 as the cutoff!
Great point about chatting up an asexual person 😂 what a minefield these people are creating.
Cross posted😁
https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/its-a-mad-mad-mad-mad-world
Dusty
Who cares if a rapist and murderer suffers from gender dysphoria? Has the world gone mad? The Newsweek article author must be completely insensitive to detail the horrific crimes this man perpetrated, while giving compassion vibes to his gender dysphoria and bra style preferences? You could not pay many people to put this drivel in print. Luckily, at least, Connecticut gave him no possibility of parole? In Australia the TIM that attacked people with an axe to their heads is already out??
Thanks ,Nutmeg. Great start following in JL's footsteps.These exposés are hugely important in the fight back against these monstrous ideas 👍👍👍
Heartening to see further confirmation that BBC Scotland is not only biased against the very idea of Scottish independence but is blatantly biased towards the mad and immensely disruptive beliefs and behaviours of the Uptons of this country (as the SNP will be, of course, while no one should believe that today's SNP gives a damn about independence, though the BBC will perpetuate that fallacy forever) and against critics who have already been proven correct like Maya Forstater. Heartening because this is another nail in the state broadcaster's coffin. In any case, Upton yours, BBC.
I think what stuck out for me here was the bizarre and nauseating spending, and that even a transgender person can't speak about Islam publicly.
Off to a flying start Nutmeg, thank you. Having been unable to tune into the Sandie Peggie tribune this week but seeing it all over X, I particularly appreciated your summary and await the comments for this next (inevitable) case win.
Hey Nutmeg. Thanks for picking up the baton passed by JL. It cannot be fun trawling through this utter nonsense, sometimes it's utterly depraved. How can anyone be sympathetic for a child rapist that knowingly set his victim on fire. I just do not get it.
Also...trans people not visible? Has Gaga gone gaga? Have a look in women's spaces, women's sports and prisons!!