This fantastic speech by Jo Bartosch was one of the highlights of yesterday’s LGB Alliance conference.
I want to talk about pride and about shame. I have never been what is crudely referred to as a “flag shagger”. I have never sat through the Queen’s Speech at Christmas, and I can’t name a single English football player.
But one thing that does make me genuinely proud to be British is that we are now known to trans activists across the world as “TERF Island”. And that’s important because the UK punches above its weight in terms of cultural exports.
What we are doing here is watched by the rest of the world. And what we are doing is standing firm against an ideology imported wholesale from the US; an ideology that has the backing of some of the world’s most powerful people.
And I’m not talking about elected politicians and peers who make the law in that building over there. I’m talking about the technocrats, those in Silicon Valley, with the power to shape minds. Social media has become a vector for body dysmorphia, and pornography has made the prospect of growing up female a sentence to sexual subservience.
Many young people now believe that their bodies can be changed like a gaming avatar. Today, lesbians only exist online as fodder for male fantasies. It’s no wonder so many girls want to opt out of womanhood. Men who use porn are increasingly becoming dead to the touch of another human, preferring to consume fantasies through a screen. For a significant minority of men, there are entire genres of “Sissy porn” and forced feminisation that are feeding their fetishistic delusion that they can change sex. For these men — typically middle-aged white men who call themselves transgender — “woman” never involves scrubbing the skidmarks out of the loo; it means being a sex object.
The technological revolution has not just changed how we think; it has moved the locus of power. A quarter of a century ago, John Perry Barlow argued, “Weary governments of flesh and steel” had no place in what he described as “the new home of the mind”.
In the years since, profit-driven social media companies have colonised space online. Unelected beardy players have programmed the parameters of what is deemed acceptable speech according to their own agenda. The rise of transgenderism, both as it manifests in confused young people and in the midlife crises of men, is just one facet of the shift towards online living.
This new form of power demands a new form of resistance. We need to think differently. Not that many years ago, I would never have imagined that I would be the one walking past protesters to speak — I would have been one of those holding a placard. And that’s been a shock, because being a progressive left-winger was part of my identity.
The mob protesting here today — those attempting to intimidate and silence people whose views they fundamentally misunderstand — have the support of everyone from President Biden and Mark Zuckerberg to Russell T. Davies.
And until the most powerful political figures in the land can say only women have a cervix without fear of reprisals, the time for political purity is past. The threat to our humanity from transgenderism transcends the divisions of left and right. The divide is between those who acknowledge reality and those who commit to a dangerous lie. So wherever we stand, politically or socially, it must be side by side. This should not be a difficult fight — not least because sustaining a lie takes more effort than upholding the truth.
And the anger we face is because our detractors know that their position is indefensible. We should take heart from the fact that the vast majority of those as yet unaffected by this social media-borne virus instinctively know that sex matters because, like it or lump it, everyone’s mum knows where babies come from. Mother Nature is a TERF.
Lesbian feminist philosopher Mary Daly came up with the idea of patriarchal reversals. She saw them everywhere. But the obvious example is the idea that Eve — a woman — came from Adam — a man. The shift in shame is a perfect example of a patriarchal reversal, we’d need not be ashamed of knowing that sex is real any more than we are of being lesbian, gay or bisexual. We don’t need so-called trans women to voice our entirely legitimate opinions for us in case we are thought unkind. We don’t need to demonstrate that we are good people before expressing our views to appease some moron who thinks that biology is a colonial concept.
It is baffling to me that we are so defensive. We have allowed ourselves to be forced back into a shame-filled closet by the ignorance and insouciance of the wider world. Where was once there was a subtle way of sussing out if someone was same-sex attracted — a hyperawareness of whole gestures and giveaways — today, a similar system has developed for those who know that sex is real and that it can’t be changed. Some have the colours of the suffragettes or dinosaurs in their social media profiles, whereas others refuse to play the pronoun game.
And, just as in years gone by, the courtesy dance around each other before we come out was a dangerous, heretical belief that sex matters. We need to stop hiding, to stop deflecting and to boldly tell the unvarnished truth that it is impossible to change sex.
Those who should be ashamed are the perverts and straight men who call themselves lesbian, the surgeons who right now are removing the healthy breasts of teenage girls, that the likes of Stonewall CEO Nancy Kelly, who is currently whining that the multi-million pound protection racket she runs is being unfairly targeted because journalists at the BBC are finally doing their job. They’re public figures like LGBT envoy Lord Herbert. It’s his job to engage with this debate, to listen, to show some leadership. And yet, I can’t see him in this room. Lord Herbert, if you see this, if you ever watch this, I would like to tell you that through your silence, you have allowed yourself to become complicit in what will go down in history as the biggest medical scandal of a generation.
We need to remember that the shame is not ours. We do not need to apologise for being lesbian, gay or bisexual — or for knowing what that means. In a way, we’ve been here before. Just as in the past, we have to lose our shame. The way forward is to come out and to stand together with pride.
(Originally published in The Critic.)
FIRST DRAFT LETTER TO SCHOOL. NOT SENT YET. WRITTEN FROM HEART.
comments on anything I have got wrong:
I am Gender Critical (GC). This means that I do not accept all the tenets of gender ideology. My view is protected by the Equalities Act 2010 as clarified in the recent Maya Forstater case.
I am not sure if the school has a policy on gender ideology. Given the UK Government does not seem to, it would be difficult for the school currently to do anything other than to manage and respect a range of different views. Which means accepting and supporting a GC view such as mine.
If I have influenced my young children towards my beliefs, I expect them to be treated fairly and respectfully at school. In the same way that my children will always respect and support anyone who wishes to be recognised another as another gender.
I expect the school to teach biological science. Sex is observed at birth, not assigned. You cannot change your sex, you can have plastic surgery to alter your genitalia but every cell in your body remains either male or female.
I personally find the idea that young people who are struggling with their appearance, their interpersonal skills or having suffered abuse are being given puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and then surgery before realising they were troubled rather than trans (detransitioners) absolutely harrowing. Other topics which are very worrisome are:
1. Self ID – male sexed bodies in womens’ prisons, toilets, refuges
2. The use of Trans as an umbrella term to include young girls who want to become boys, fully transexual people (operated on) and male heterosexuals (transvestites).
3. Young lesbians transitioning before they realised they were lesbians (Kiera Bell).
4. Male bodied people taking place in female sports
Many rights being demanded by some Gender Ideology campaigners, such as male sexed people who self ID as women, conflict directly with women’s rights to female only spaces.
This is a contentious area of debate. The LBG Alliance has formed to distance themselves from Stonewall and the LGBT Alliance. This is because the T in LGBT (Trans) is not a sexual orientation, and in fact some of their ideology damages homosexuals – some activists find the idea of same-sex attraction to be Transphobic.
Most of the leading GC campaigners are lesbians. Anyone who questions gender ideology is assumed to be transphobic and a bigot and they are put on the back foot by these presumptions/accusations.
Stonewall have been paid by the BBC, Welsh Govt, Ofcom, Scottish Gov to lobby them on gender ideology. This is under investigation by Stephen Nolan (BBC Sounds) in his Stonewall series of podcasts. I think this is the tip of the iceberg and many organisations will review their membership of Stonewall and their approach to Gender Ideology, not least for fear of legal action.
I would appreciate knowing that the school have made themselves as aware as possible of both sides of this debate, and that no child or parent suffers for having a GC view. To this end I recommend:
• Irreversible Damage by Abigail Shrier
• Trans by Helen Joyce
• BBC Sounds Stephen Nolan on Stonewall
These books are thoroughly researched by well respected journalists with many excellent reviews from leading newspapers, but of course if you google them you will find some very angry negative reviews from Trans campaigners, which is no excuse to not read the books. From the school’s perspective, Abigail Shrier’s theory that the desire to identify (and perhaps transition) as male is catching amongst young girls.
There are many transexuals who are extremely worried about the effects of unquestioned acceptance of gender ideology, such as Debbie Hayton who writes for the Times and The Spectator.
An interesting area for the school to investigate with older girls is gender stereotypes, especially how social media might emphasise these stereotypes. How does it feel to not conform with these stereotypes through your interests, feelings and appearance?
Thank you for your kind attention.
Wow! Jo was there long before Nolan and she doesn't get the credit she deserves - this is just brilliant.
I'd share it but I'm in twitter jail for saying Rachel Levine is not a female. Trying to decide if I want to play on twitter enough to have to collude in an outright lie and I don't think I do.