I watched the video of students attempting to explain gender identity and I weep for the future. They can't even explain it, name anything but male and female and it is so obvious that they are all trotting out the same tired lines they have swallowed wholesale. Universities used to be places of debate, critical thought and challenge, now they seem to be places where you get taught to trot out nonsense mantra and don't ask questions.
Disturbing stuff but a great photo at the top to cheer us up.
Whenever I see women demonstrating for our rights somewhere in the world, I get so moved I want to hug everyone. Lovely to hear the new from the US. Something really is happening there.
I also now enjoy seeing 'controversial' and 'Stonewall' in the same sentence. Yes, words are powerful.
And, as a French person I'll say this: Michel Foucault (pronounce it 'fuck all' or 'fuck it' it's all the same to me) est un vieux degueulasse et un enfoire. Une vraie sous-merde.
So any attack on that dirty old bastard is definitely not anti-French.
Oh...those young women. They are so close and yet so far. Think they invented gender nonconformity. No concept of what males are capable of. Bless their innocence - don't blame them in a way. Once your eyes are opened it's really really shit.
I think it's really important to understand that Kathleen Stock herself has said, including in today's Observer interview, that the worst vitriol came from her colleagues, not her students:
Just watched that interview with students at Sussex ! Totally shocking how far gone they are ,even although it's very obvious that they have NO IDEA what they're talking about and have absolutely zero understanding of the real life issues and the harms that these " beliefs " have caused , and continue to cause , to real people ,mostly to women and children. They've definitely swallowed the koolaid and are just reciting parrot fashion what they've been indoctrinated into. To think that they ,and others like them ,were responsible for bullying and harassing Kathleen Stock out of her job.. That's unforgivable and I completely agree with the interviewer's opinions at the end. Hope those idiots watched it .
Thank you. What a bumper selection. Why is Laurie Penny continuing to argue some really weak points? Vive la France.
I'd like to pose this question to her - just because we don’t have a specific ‘law’ officially telling us not to do something specific means it’s ok to do it? Huh Laurie? Nothing tells us deep down it might not be a great idea, and we don’t need someone, or a big red sign saying NO STOP!
Does she drive? I think much law doesn’t detail exactly how nasty or stupid you can be to infringe the rights of others, as you know, it’s the general principle? Legislation would be very long if every muppet says, but it didn’t say in 4.4.12 ‘Laurie! This is for you, just you, right now and here on Saturday with poor visibility, we suggest you wear a seat belt and don’t drive at 60 in this 30mph zone, but you know, as you were!’. Then put really big red signs every four metres, you know, just so she ‘knows’. She has no feasible way to work things out otherwise. She might not have realised that many laws cover many things and need to be drafted so those who choose to think like she does try to find a way round them. Oh, but you didn't make it clear! Or there was a law against it?! That is your defence Laurie? She is somehow arguing that freer drafting of principles or very historically misogynist hangover ways of drafting, and some contentious attitudes in France who tend to be less proscriptive about certain things, means it's ok to be a paedophile? Still?
No one told me or reminded me not to? Oh fill your boots French paedos Laurie thinks that's ok on a very weak misreading of a technical misunderstanding. Is she not aware of all the demonstrations by women in France, and why?
West Yorkshire Police say that they will be recording misogyny and misandry as an aggravating factor in crimes. But they intend only to ask victims whether they feel hostility to their gender was a motivating factor. They won't be recording crimes motivated by hostility to person's sex - many of us don't have a gender.
The CSO pulled the same trick with the Crime Survey for England and Wales. They recorded crime reported by
(1) people who had the same gender identity as their sex registered at birth and
(2) people who had a different gender identity from their sex registered at birth.
They don't bother recording crime against people who don't have a gender identity.
Channel 4 is where? Dont we have laws againt prending to be a child in porn. Decades ago you couldnt say you were underage while having phone sex, or do fisting. Who removed protections?
17 min 24 sec into the "Exposing Woke Students' Gender Nonsense" it seems it doesn't take long to brainwash the students at Sussex Uni. A year it took for that guy there, apparently, once he'd got to Brighton. Oh no! Wait a minute -18 min 6 sec: He thinks there's one more...so that makes 5 genders.... EPIC FAIL! Go straight to jail. Do not collect £200, do not pass go. Only 5 genders? You must do better mate. There are 100s don't you know.
Those students, it's bad enough saying "They are no longer biologocal men....even if they haven't transitioned" but saying that 'trans' women in men's prisons are at far more risk than they are to women in a women's prison or kids of 6 have some of the best ideas.... it's ludicrous. And the things they are saying about testosterone levels are simply not true. They are completely misinformed and sorry, thick as shit. But most of all, they are dangerous.
First point with the those "students" the guy is taking the proverbial! but they so naïve they can't see it!
They sound like middle class namby pamby kids who know nothing, and have been nowhere … but have jumped on the band wagon.
Its like Dougal and the spider baby.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xkOBvcAO1o&ab_channel=HatTrick
I watched the video of students attempting to explain gender identity and I weep for the future. They can't even explain it, name anything but male and female and it is so obvious that they are all trotting out the same tired lines they have swallowed wholesale. Universities used to be places of debate, critical thought and challenge, now they seem to be places where you get taught to trot out nonsense mantra and don't ask questions.
Disturbing stuff but a great photo at the top to cheer us up.
Whenever I see women demonstrating for our rights somewhere in the world, I get so moved I want to hug everyone. Lovely to hear the new from the US. Something really is happening there.
I also now enjoy seeing 'controversial' and 'Stonewall' in the same sentence. Yes, words are powerful.
And, as a French person I'll say this: Michel Foucault (pronounce it 'fuck all' or 'fuck it' it's all the same to me) est un vieux degueulasse et un enfoire. Une vraie sous-merde.
So any attack on that dirty old bastard is definitely not anti-French.
Oh...those young women. They are so close and yet so far. Think they invented gender nonconformity. No concept of what males are capable of. Bless their innocence - don't blame them in a way. Once your eyes are opened it's really really shit.
What is Laurie Penny’s malfunction? Seriously?
I think it's really important to understand that Kathleen Stock herself has said, including in today's Observer interview, that the worst vitriol came from her colleagues, not her students:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/05/kathleen-stock-interview-university-sussex-transgender-headlines-2021
That overweight girl with the blue hair is a foot-soldier; an immature young person who found a tribe and swallowed their dogma.
Just watched that interview with students at Sussex ! Totally shocking how far gone they are ,even although it's very obvious that they have NO IDEA what they're talking about and have absolutely zero understanding of the real life issues and the harms that these " beliefs " have caused , and continue to cause , to real people ,mostly to women and children. They've definitely swallowed the koolaid and are just reciting parrot fashion what they've been indoctrinated into. To think that they ,and others like them ,were responsible for bullying and harassing Kathleen Stock out of her job.. That's unforgivable and I completely agree with the interviewer's opinions at the end. Hope those idiots watched it .
Wow. Such a lot to take in! Thanks Graham.
Here's a great article by Debbie Hayter in the DM which I've forwarded to my sympathetic MP. Hope she speaks out in the House of Commons.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10273719/Transwoman-DEBBIE-HAYTON-gives-view-new-Government-bill.html
I do find it funny when Laurie Penny says something so out there that it gets not a single like from her 176,000 followers. And then she doubles down!
Reddit run by pedophiles?
Well, spank my ass and call me Susan!
Thank you. What a bumper selection. Why is Laurie Penny continuing to argue some really weak points? Vive la France.
I'd like to pose this question to her - just because we don’t have a specific ‘law’ officially telling us not to do something specific means it’s ok to do it? Huh Laurie? Nothing tells us deep down it might not be a great idea, and we don’t need someone, or a big red sign saying NO STOP!
Does she drive? I think much law doesn’t detail exactly how nasty or stupid you can be to infringe the rights of others, as you know, it’s the general principle? Legislation would be very long if every muppet says, but it didn’t say in 4.4.12 ‘Laurie! This is for you, just you, right now and here on Saturday with poor visibility, we suggest you wear a seat belt and don’t drive at 60 in this 30mph zone, but you know, as you were!’. Then put really big red signs every four metres, you know, just so she ‘knows’. She has no feasible way to work things out otherwise. She might not have realised that many laws cover many things and need to be drafted so those who choose to think like she does try to find a way round them. Oh, but you didn't make it clear! Or there was a law against it?! That is your defence Laurie? She is somehow arguing that freer drafting of principles or very historically misogynist hangover ways of drafting, and some contentious attitudes in France who tend to be less proscriptive about certain things, means it's ok to be a paedophile? Still?
No one told me or reminded me not to? Oh fill your boots French paedos Laurie thinks that's ok on a very weak misreading of a technical misunderstanding. Is she not aware of all the demonstrations by women in France, and why?
West Yorkshire Police say that they will be recording misogyny and misandry as an aggravating factor in crimes. But they intend only to ask victims whether they feel hostility to their gender was a motivating factor. They won't be recording crimes motivated by hostility to person's sex - many of us don't have a gender.
The CSO pulled the same trick with the Crime Survey for England and Wales. They recorded crime reported by
(1) people who had the same gender identity as their sex registered at birth and
(2) people who had a different gender identity from their sex registered at birth.
They don't bother recording crime against people who don't have a gender identity.
Channel 4 is where? Dont we have laws againt prending to be a child in porn. Decades ago you couldnt say you were underage while having phone sex, or do fisting. Who removed protections?
T did nothing. They hid. Said they were delusional.
17 min 24 sec into the "Exposing Woke Students' Gender Nonsense" it seems it doesn't take long to brainwash the students at Sussex Uni. A year it took for that guy there, apparently, once he'd got to Brighton. Oh no! Wait a minute -18 min 6 sec: He thinks there's one more...so that makes 5 genders.... EPIC FAIL! Go straight to jail. Do not collect £200, do not pass go. Only 5 genders? You must do better mate. There are 100s don't you know.
Those students, it's bad enough saying "They are no longer biologocal men....even if they haven't transitioned" but saying that 'trans' women in men's prisons are at far more risk than they are to women in a women's prison or kids of 6 have some of the best ideas.... it's ludicrous. And the things they are saying about testosterone levels are simply not true. They are completely misinformed and sorry, thick as shit. But most of all, they are dangerous.