*Turns off replies* Always a sign of rigorous moral principles. On the hilarious Dr.Hartland Incredible thread.Don’t miss the videos at the end! Barry Wall on how the lunatics are now running the asylum Stalin on a charm offensive You may recognise some of these answers yourself
E. J. Rosetta's list of non-excuses that 'trans' people have had to conjure up to explain their labelling of JKR as 'transphobic' is so so familiar. What peaked me exactly was JKR's measured, beautifully written essay outlining her concerns for the loss of women's sex-based rights. Well! The over-the-top reaction from 'trans' people and their 'allies' peaked the crap out of me. Especially, when I read one of them almost forbidding anyone from reading the essay. 'Please please don't read this -- it's too triggering and will make you feel 'unsafe' at best, and 'suicidal' at worst. I've read it for you, and I can assure you it's 'transphobic'.' I remember the moment I was reading this particular reaction tweet and saw so many twitter followers step into line. I knew then that the jig was up. Completely closed minds. Cult-like admonitions not to take any countervailing information on board. It was chilling. It still is.
And still the BBC gets it wrong. Brain of Britain was won by a trans-identified man. There are no subsets of women regardless of what the wokerati think.
Starmer says Labour would act to protect girls and women? No they won't. Labour councils are at the heart of the problem of why young girls are not being protected from grooming gangs. Gang members were and probably still are members of Labour. Oldham councillors caused people protesting about the council's failure to be arrested at a meeting, what have they got to hide? Labour are utterly useless. Starmer is virtue signalling to try to get votes. That man makes me utterly sick.
It's his fault that the Pakistani gangs spread everywhere, because he failed when head of the CPS to prosecute the Rochdale gang members even though there was ample evidence.
Sorry about the rant but Starmer's hypocrisy makes me see red when he virtue signals and meanwhile very young girls are gang raped day after day.
Paul Sinha made a dig about you, Graham, during his stand up about 2 years ago. I went up to him at the end to express my disappointment but he pointedly ignored me, arrogant prick!
Listening to Radio 2 in car yesterday morning. News featured a piece about acting awards - recall non binary actors think they are being slurred by male and female categories. They could turn any award down?
The BBC is utterly hopeless - as this is a belief system should they not have quoted someone else (eg Graham) to demonstrate their impartiality as journalists paid by us?
The PhD shrink who diagnosed Neddy (1 appt) said it was my refusal to stay in the marriage that "forced 'her' to decide to live 'full-time' as a female" sworn affidavit submitted to Kings County Court Bkln NY 1996
Sinha's tweet is apparently from "an account that no longer exists". Nice to see a fella with the courage of his convictions ...
Though that tweet about one "Dr. Hartland" claiming that "sex is socially contrived" highlights the ongoing battle over how to define sex. Y'all may have seen the case of physicist Sean Carroll -- who should stick to physics -- painting himself into a corner by arguing in favour of sex as a spectrum:
Though "biologist" Colin Wright is peddling the same sort of anti-scientific schlock by insisting "sex is immutable" (it ain't -- see clownfish for starters). Wright tried to walk that back on his own Substack, but, by the standard biological definitions, many other species -- including the human one -- have many members who are, in point of fact, sexless:
Whole "debate" over the definitions for sex is riven -- on virtually all sides -- with articles of faith, and of outright dogma and antiscientific claptrap.
But speaking of Twitter itself and ICYMI, seems a general amnesty is afoot in the inner sanctums there:
"First they came for the trans community .... and then they came for the trans community"?!
Someone should explain to Paul that this "first they came for ... and then they came for ...." morality tale only makes sense if it applies to different communities in a line of succession. Or does he think the trans community is the ONLY community?
Sad to lack any empathy! I'm sure he's got women in his family, he works with women, he doesn't live in a vacuum, no excuse for his misogyny. I don't have any black South Africans in my life, didn't stop me protesting Apartheid for many years!
Important:
A Susie Green interview on a podcast about Mermaids (the mythical creature - seriously) where red flag after red flag comes out of her own mouth.
https://player.fm/series/the-mermaid-podcast/mermaids-uk-embrace-empower-educate
Hey Reality Girl can we get T-shirts and posters of this stuff???
E. J. Rosetta's list of non-excuses that 'trans' people have had to conjure up to explain their labelling of JKR as 'transphobic' is so so familiar. What peaked me exactly was JKR's measured, beautifully written essay outlining her concerns for the loss of women's sex-based rights. Well! The over-the-top reaction from 'trans' people and their 'allies' peaked the crap out of me. Especially, when I read one of them almost forbidding anyone from reading the essay. 'Please please don't read this -- it's too triggering and will make you feel 'unsafe' at best, and 'suicidal' at worst. I've read it for you, and I can assure you it's 'transphobic'.' I remember the moment I was reading this particular reaction tweet and saw so many twitter followers step into line. I knew then that the jig was up. Completely closed minds. Cult-like admonitions not to take any countervailing information on board. It was chilling. It still is.
Peak Trans All Star Cards. Brilliant! We need to see the whole pack of 'em.
And still the BBC gets it wrong. Brain of Britain was won by a trans-identified man. There are no subsets of women regardless of what the wokerati think.
Boycott Primark.
Starmer says Labour would act to protect girls and women? No they won't. Labour councils are at the heart of the problem of why young girls are not being protected from grooming gangs. Gang members were and probably still are members of Labour. Oldham councillors caused people protesting about the council's failure to be arrested at a meeting, what have they got to hide? Labour are utterly useless. Starmer is virtue signalling to try to get votes. That man makes me utterly sick.
It's his fault that the Pakistani gangs spread everywhere, because he failed when head of the CPS to prosecute the Rochdale gang members even though there was ample evidence.
Sorry about the rant but Starmer's hypocrisy makes me see red when he virtue signals and meanwhile very young girls are gang raped day after day.
Primark is crap. Nearly everything shrinks. And now this gender shit.
Boycott.
No it's because you use expressions like "horse crap" when replying to people. Cut it out or comment somewhere else.
Richard Osman just used the phase "if someone is differently gendered"...... they're all at it!
Why didn't 'Dr' Hartland include anything about the '+' in his piss-poor 'presentation'?
Is he, I wonder, discriminating against paedophiles and bestialitists and all the other wastes of life 'captured' by the '+'?
#ShameOnHim
Paul Sinha made a dig about you, Graham, during his stand up about 2 years ago. I went up to him at the end to express my disappointment but he pointedly ignored me, arrogant prick!
Listening to Radio 2 in car yesterday morning. News featured a piece about acting awards - recall non binary actors think they are being slurred by male and female categories. They could turn any award down?
The BBC is utterly hopeless - as this is a belief system should they not have quoted someone else (eg Graham) to demonstrate their impartiality as journalists paid by us?
Well, here's a 13 second retort to them all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbVA1TCIXb8
The PhD shrink who diagnosed Neddy (1 appt) said it was my refusal to stay in the marriage that "forced 'her' to decide to live 'full-time' as a female" sworn affidavit submitted to Kings County Court Bkln NY 1996
Sinha's tweet is apparently from "an account that no longer exists". Nice to see a fella with the courage of his convictions ...
Though that tweet about one "Dr. Hartland" claiming that "sex is socially contrived" highlights the ongoing battle over how to define sex. Y'all may have seen the case of physicist Sean Carroll -- who should stick to physics -- painting himself into a corner by arguing in favour of sex as a spectrum:
https://nitter.it/seanmcarroll/status/1592168158865281025
Though "biologist" Colin Wright is peddling the same sort of anti-scientific schlock by insisting "sex is immutable" (it ain't -- see clownfish for starters). Wright tried to walk that back on his own Substack, but, by the standard biological definitions, many other species -- including the human one -- have many members who are, in point of fact, sexless:
https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/weekly-recap-66a/comment/10591965
Whole "debate" over the definitions for sex is riven -- on virtually all sides -- with articles of faith, and of outright dogma and antiscientific claptrap.
But speaking of Twitter itself and ICYMI, seems a general amnesty is afoot in the inner sanctums there:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1595869526469533701
"First they came for the trans community .... and then they came for the trans community"?!
Someone should explain to Paul that this "first they came for ... and then they came for ...." morality tale only makes sense if it applies to different communities in a line of succession. Or does he think the trans community is the ONLY community?
Sad to lack any empathy! I'm sure he's got women in his family, he works with women, he doesn't live in a vacuum, no excuse for his misogyny. I don't have any black South Africans in my life, didn't stop me protesting Apartheid for many years!